and to expand on this further .. i strongly su

and to expand on this further ..

i strongly suspect Eco's *deal* would have been presented as a fait accompli
on or around 5.5.15

without the interruption of the 2nd buyer ..

whose *size* (order) clearly dwarfs Eco's

which from my own personal experience (prior life .. large ticket sales of the high tech variety)
results in *solutions* on offer .. not obstructions .. or an inability to *think*

which is why >> *I* >> have given thought that a prox is/was assembled and
tested at one of OBG's NY sites

for several reasons .. not the least of which would be to test >> buyer no. 2's materials

as has been noted *here* a few x over .. private co.s aren't required to *file* or update

which is why this actual P2O investor >> ponders the possibility that the next
material event filed by P2O pertains to monies transferred from buyer to seller

the joy of actual real world work experience .. being solution oriented and understanding
why RH would still be funding ops (even tho' reduced significantly) in 2015

4kids