If a stock dropped 40% in a few hours (from 10 ce
Post# of 2009
If merely shorting could cause losses like that everyone would do it.
More likely he knew something. Do you remember what bad news was announced shortly thereafter?
Possibly a a.s. increase?
Maybe that even after being kit Kat approved the np1 was announced to just be merely a unicorn?
Something like that perhaps?
The question I have is
Who's paying the pimps on the pony board?
Don't you find it questionable that views could go up and average of sevenfold while posts went up by a factor of ten?
On a stock issuing shares like candy and tanking while delivering nothing?really? We're supposed to believe interest in this garbage is that much in demand?
Isn't it more likely the factors I listed here, along with other factors mentioned here ad nauseam , i.e. nteks failures, and non stop diluting, is the cause of the pps falling off a cliff.
Funny. I seem to recall al stone saying pps was on a precipice, ready to fall off a cliff. Thanks for the warning, al.
Someone's paying for the pumps.