Bob, To follow up with what you said, for the b
Post# of 9144
Posted On: 06/19/2015 6:49:03 PM
Bob,
To follow up with what you said, for the benefit of newer shareholders or prospective shareholders, I take your point to be "if you can't take the heat, better get out the kitchen", not that all is lost in NNLX. I think the company has never been better positioned in all of it's history, with the patents coming on-line and the very important N-Assay.
I will also say that I was extremely impressed with Michelle D and believe that she contributed substantially to the company. She may still be doing some consulting or providing advice. At this stage in her career, I'm sure that the prospect of steady short-term compensation was compelling, I know she is a big asset to her current employer and I hope that she still holds some shares for the long term. Bret sounds like he is running a lean, mean focused machine while the N-Assay continues to percolate and word continues to build. Most all of the naysayers have absolutely no idea how challenging this is. If you bought in during the heady days of Spring 2009 to say 2012, I'm sure the current price is disappointing. But as Bob says, this is not an easy-money game nor a get-rich quick scheme. Unless you bought in as part of a PIPE, the company didn't get any of your funds directly. You are a shareholder, yes; but NNLX is non-reporting and cannot and should not be held to the standards of a blue-chip company. You want IBM reporting and transparency, buy IBM, so to speak. In doing so, your risk will be lower, but so will your potential reward. Amen, father Bob.
The fact that the known bashers so consistently blather here, day in day out, and it is so obvious to anyone who pays attention for a month or more, gives me a level of confidence frankly that they know there is still tremendous potential here.
JimmieEddie, this is not a pump. This is my perspective. Now go look at some birds on your favorite forum; and have fun at your next gig.
To follow up with what you said, for the benefit of newer shareholders or prospective shareholders, I take your point to be "if you can't take the heat, better get out the kitchen", not that all is lost in NNLX. I think the company has never been better positioned in all of it's history, with the patents coming on-line and the very important N-Assay.
I will also say that I was extremely impressed with Michelle D and believe that she contributed substantially to the company. She may still be doing some consulting or providing advice. At this stage in her career, I'm sure that the prospect of steady short-term compensation was compelling, I know she is a big asset to her current employer and I hope that she still holds some shares for the long term. Bret sounds like he is running a lean, mean focused machine while the N-Assay continues to percolate and word continues to build. Most all of the naysayers have absolutely no idea how challenging this is. If you bought in during the heady days of Spring 2009 to say 2012, I'm sure the current price is disappointing. But as Bob says, this is not an easy-money game nor a get-rich quick scheme. Unless you bought in as part of a PIPE, the company didn't get any of your funds directly. You are a shareholder, yes; but NNLX is non-reporting and cannot and should not be held to the standards of a blue-chip company. You want IBM reporting and transparency, buy IBM, so to speak. In doing so, your risk will be lower, but so will your potential reward. Amen, father Bob.
The fact that the known bashers so consistently blather here, day in day out, and it is so obvious to anyone who pays attention for a month or more, gives me a level of confidence frankly that they know there is still tremendous potential here.
JimmieEddie, this is not a pump. This is my perspective. Now go look at some birds on your favorite forum; and have fun at your next gig.
(0)
(0)