Shareholders, Wouldn't the state of Nevada be c
Post# of 12259
Posted On: 06/17/2015 6:51:15 PM
Re: #1 Red Sox Fan #7938
Shareholders,
Wouldn't the state of Nevada be correct, UMMM YES..........
No increase was done, the TA can not do anything unless it is on the site with a increase.
Share Structure is correct, and will be going down again.
Action Type: Amendment
Document Number: 20150228600-16 # of Pages: 7
File Date: 5/20/2015 Effective Date:
Previous Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 6,710,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 Par Value Shares: 100,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 6,810,000.00 New Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 6,710,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 Par Value Shares: 100,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 6,810,000.00
CEO
Wouldn't the state of Nevada be correct, UMMM YES..........
No increase was done, the TA can not do anything unless it is on the site with a increase.
Share Structure is correct, and will be going down again.
Action Type: Amendment
Document Number: 20150228600-16 # of Pages: 7
File Date: 5/20/2015 Effective Date:
Previous Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 6,710,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 Par Value Shares: 100,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 6,810,000.00 New Stock Value: Par Value Shares: 6,710,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 Par Value Shares: 100,000,000 Value: $ 0.001 No Par Value Shares: 0
Total Authorized Capital: $ 6,810,000.00
CEO
(0)
(0)Mining Global Inc. (MNGG) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼