i wonder who really has the obsession since the ma

i wonder who really has the obsession since the mantra here at eegc with a few expert at twisting facts has always been to downgrade the discovery potential in tasmania via empire energy.for years the same few will never acknowledge a seep of any kind in tasmania.they cling to a 2000 geological report that states basically no seeps in tasmania but for the bitumen seep at lonnavale[referred to as a farce] discovered in 1995.i have therefore taken the few dissenters to task showing several articles by mrt docs [mineral resources tasmania]mentioning the recent tasmanian geological survey bulletin 72 of 2007 that emphatically refers to the lonnavale seep as a seep.still the denials persist as in the word obfuscation.nevertheless in the spirit of truth i share the mrt 2007 geological survey bulletin 72 report you the reader judge for yourself. please go to page 22 and read for yourselves.. i earnestly hope eegc proves soon by drilling how wrong these few have been by proving the hydrocarbon potential in tasmania.imo

http://www.mrt.tas.gov.au/mrtdoc/dominfo/down...SB72_2.pdf


quotes starting from page 22



"seep at Lonnavale, WSW of Hobart (fig. 15), was
derived from a Tasmanites-bearing source (Revill,
1996). A suggested mechanism is heat from intruding
dolerite generating hydrocarbons from an oil shale
source, with migration facilitated by fractures in the
dolerite (Bacon et al., 2000).
Jurassic dolerite "