I agree-pps could be supported at minimum cost at

I agree-pps could be supported at minimum cost at this pps-limited to 25% of daily volume-as balahi has posted from his excellent research. 500,000 shares/day at max of maybe 20 days/month would cost $39,600/month at present pps of .0036.  Half that at 10 days/month.

I can only guess that Bao has been pushing additional equipment to increase production-and a probable motive for paying for orders 3 and 4 at the dock (assuming it was Bao- a good assumption) because Bao presumably wants a lot more ore.  And that is a companies natural inclination -to increase production. But it would be nice to remember the poor chaps who bought in reliance on all the promises -including buyback/ship-especiallly for longs who are forced to sell at such a fraction of their cost because of lifes circumstances. Though we will be rewarded in the long run w the huge increase in production due to emphasis on increasing equipment. But longs dont like the present environment- which favors shorters.