Because it WAS "Off Topic", you made it personal a
Post# of 9964
Anyhow, you seem to be of the opinion that nobody can think for themselves and that the reason for the MRIB tanking is because of "Short sellers" and/or because of what Berg posts. Not true. The reason's for the stock tanking is simply because of former PUMPERS and "fraudulent" ?) PRs by the company that haven't seen the light of day. When is enough enough for some folks? When does it sink in that when the CEO says that she be surprised if the pps of MRIB would be mid-20s Dec. of 2104, $105,000,000 in Marani 2.0 International contracts PRs, "TV Commercials and Print Ad" that were supposedly to air in "30 Days" (That was about a year ago, or something like that) and the PRed increase production to 20,000 cases a month:
http://www.wallstreet-online.de/nachricht/641...mium-vodka
(Oh, and this just 9 days later!!)
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/marani-brand...2013-11-22
The real problem is that current bag holders didn't HAVE TO HOLD. They could have sold any time they wished. But why DIDN'T they? Why did some sell while others are still holding? It's simply because THEY DON'T BELIEVE THAT MARANI IS A SCAM, WHILE MANY WHO DID SELL STARTING THINKING IT MIGHT ACTUALLY BE A SCAM.
What are you in at? I'll bet it's very low. What? .007? Lower? Well how about those who got in @ .02 or higher based on some/all the PRs that haven't come to fruitation? Hell, I first got in @.045 or so. Damn right I'm pissed off. And not at myself but at Margrit for all the PRs that haven't seen the light of day yet but which helped, with the aid of MB (paid?) PUMPERS THEMSELVES who pumped up the PPS before the dilution and tanking started.
There is nobody to blame but Margrit and company themselves and, yes, they ARE FAILURES. Been in business since, when 2002? She even, recently, admitted to selling another brand of vodka and not even mentioning it to shareholders. WTF?
Okay, anyhow, what I hope is the the SEC and IRS are investigating her. Because, truth be told, if nothing became of such of an investigation than good for her, and it'd prove that Berg and others were WRONG to suggest this is a scam. But if it turns out she gets busted then it proves they were CORRECT after all. But, in either case, at least we'd know for sure as the debate certainly won't be settled by people posting on message boards.
JMOS.
GLTA