I am by no means a lawyer or have any legal backgr
Post# of 56323
Posted On: 06/02/2015 3:32:54 PM
I am by no means a lawyer or have any legal background. This is IMO what the new doc's mean...
- 2015-06-01 Toronto Letter from Respondent dated 01-JUN-2015 informing the Court that upon reviewing the applicant's affidavit with exhibits delivered to the respondent on May 25, 2015, certain information was redacted in the Certified Tribunal Record but was not redacted in the affidavit material and the Respondent will be bringing a confidentiality motion in writing and request to have the Court remove the applicant's affidavit removed from the public record until the motion has been decided received on 01-JUN-2015
Looks like HC is informing the court that they have received Cen Biotech’s affidavit and exhibits on 5/25/15 and certain information was redacted in the Certified Record, but not the affidavit (• formerly classified documents that were redacted before release to protect still confidential material •) HC then is asking the court to remove the affidavit from public record until the case has been decided.
- 2015-06-02 Toronto Memorandum to file from John Gornick - Toronto Registry dated 02-JUN-2015 I left a message with Mr. Michael Morris - Respondent's Counsel regarding his letter dated May 25, 2015 and requesting to have the Court remove the applicant's affidavit from the public record and informed him that the Court did not receive the Applicant's affidavit or proof of service and that as per rule 306, only proof of service is to be filed with the Court as the Affidavit will be in the Application Record placed on file.
Memo from John Gornick (no idea who he is) telling Michael Morris HC counsel that the affidavit and exhibits were not filed with the court per rule 306 only proof of service was filed, so there is nothing to remove from public record.
GO FITX$$$$$$
- 2015-06-01 Toronto Letter from Respondent dated 01-JUN-2015 informing the Court that upon reviewing the applicant's affidavit with exhibits delivered to the respondent on May 25, 2015, certain information was redacted in the Certified Tribunal Record but was not redacted in the affidavit material and the Respondent will be bringing a confidentiality motion in writing and request to have the Court remove the applicant's affidavit removed from the public record until the motion has been decided received on 01-JUN-2015
Looks like HC is informing the court that they have received Cen Biotech’s affidavit and exhibits on 5/25/15 and certain information was redacted in the Certified Record, but not the affidavit (• formerly classified documents that were redacted before release to protect still confidential material •) HC then is asking the court to remove the affidavit from public record until the case has been decided.
- 2015-06-02 Toronto Memorandum to file from John Gornick - Toronto Registry dated 02-JUN-2015 I left a message with Mr. Michael Morris - Respondent's Counsel regarding his letter dated May 25, 2015 and requesting to have the Court remove the applicant's affidavit from the public record and informed him that the Court did not receive the Applicant's affidavit or proof of service and that as per rule 306, only proof of service is to be filed with the Court as the Affidavit will be in the Application Record placed on file.
Memo from John Gornick (no idea who he is) telling Michael Morris HC counsel that the affidavit and exhibits were not filed with the court per rule 306 only proof of service was filed, so there is nothing to remove from public record.
GO FITX$$$$$$
(0)
(0)Creative Edge Nutrition Inc. (FITX) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼