all imo 1) >> NO suspect ECO actually h

all imo



1) >> NO

suspect ECO actually had whatever they needed tested in the back half of 2013

i think ECO's pilot was a smoke screen with the expectation when written
(filed in early Jan .. clearly *agreed upon and written prior to Jan 2015)
that ECO's monies would be transferred to P2O .. this week

equally clearly (at least to me) something happened in regards to the 2nd buyer
back in early to Mid February .. (remember hiring advert and ACC reiteration)
.. and why i suspect there is overlap across multiple levels (including whomever
ECO is fronting for) and OBG

2) >> see above .. OBG has a very diverse clientele and imo knows P2O *well*
to say nothing of having access to JB for any additional consulting to solve
problems *tasked* with via said diverse clientele

Just an FYI

OBG wouldn't be in the picture (clue yesterday was their link in P2O's PR)

if they didn't sign off on this ..

zero doubts OBG >> tested P2O's FLAGSHIP in 2013 (back half)

imo it's why JB and RH were almost *giddy* with confidence @ the Dec 2013 AGM


suspect more than a few are missing the forest thru the trees

and to be clear >> with all the *NOISE* in play by those UPSIDE DOWN

it's understandable


Just me perhaps .. but my expectation is sometime within the 2nd Q (ends 6.30.15)

we'll see either a DA or LOI between P2O and 2nd buyer of P2O's prox

next up >> most likely >> is the Q (filed by 5.15.15) .. which will most likely suck

but it's another level in P2O's foundation being laid
as a SURVIVOR of the OTC cesspool
en route to a DISRUPTOR in an emerging sector ..
in its ASCENSION

it literally doesn't get much better than this .. imo

4kids