yeah .. i can see why *articulating* what the crew
Post# of 43064
would be problematic for said *crew*
particularly when noted contemporaneously for *all* to digest .. hmmmm
you know up until last week i'd just presumed SE was solicited for info by the crew >> there
i have to wonder after those last *reads* out of SA >> if SE did the soliciting
re: *original* crew
sure puts a whole new slant on *timing* and that 1M abusive short position
in play re: PTOI after Dec 2009's >> orchestrated RUN UP
here's to discovery
4kids
==================
Quote:
Posted On: 04/01/2015 4:10:49 PM
Posted By: 4kids
Re: ThePennyGuru #18911
what was really revealing
bringing down ETRF .. EOD
for the UC on the ask to >> 087
watching to see if every trade (sans 15k .. 10100 @ 0832 and 53)
gets marked ..
$0.0871 20,000 OTO 13:59:29
$0.085 53 OTO 13:59:27
$0.0871 500 OTO 13:36:33
$0.0832 8,000 OTO 13:35:15
$0.0832 2,100 OTO 13:28:31
$0.0871 1,000 OTO 12:55:31
$0.084 15,000 OTO 12:10:52
$0.085 47,100 OTO 11:28:46
if actually marked .. they are in even deeper sh*t than i realized
as i noted elsewhere earlier today
imo the 47,100 is a pure reset done @ ask (usually marked)
imo it's 2 20ks .. 1 5k and 2100
notice we see 20k and a 2100 later on in today's tape
2 known timestamps ..
1k @ 0871 and
11623 bundled into 15,000 @ 084 (offset = 3377)
curious to see if anything else today gets claimed
literally LOL'ing re: ETRF's UC last few minutes today
oh yeah .. and somebody better wake up the placeholder @ .105
4kids