au contraire SE
the only *investor* who posts about *embedded signals* is moi
P2O has hundreds of other investors besides moi .. see why divert/deflect/twist
comes to mind
btw i'm also the investor who has noted *100s* of times that each person has
to know their own risk tolerance .. and have *clarity* in regards to their own DD
when it comes to PTOI
key for most *imo* will be BoD being seated
that will be the *signal* >> colluding entities >> CANT ignore
minions can check with master to ascertain what that *fact* entails
btw .. zero doubts that RH has pursued parallel paths re: P2O
any Ceo in his shoes (worth their salt would) but *leverage* re: price tag
requires *sales* of prox .. which was why my initial price target (btw we
both know national engineering company wouldn't be in the picture @
14 months + without founder's *flagship* >> doing exactly as claimed)
was (using 150M I/O) 300M$ to 600M$ (2.50 and 5.00 respectively)
but since then DD on *imo* backers of Eco and *overlap* with who i
believe to be the 2nd and 3rd buyers of prox .. (to say nothing of noting
all those top tier co.s getting into this technology) has me adjusting P2O's
price tag to a minimum of 1.2B$ >> quite possibly >> 2B$ (8.00 and 13.33)
and that is NOT including any *run for cover >> partial or otherwise*
so for at least this *actual* P2O investor >> risk/reward based on *realistic
timelines <6 years is flat out stunning for those who have actually worked
in a start up that transtions to successful early adopter> and *actual ongoing
DD* >> indicates to moi .. a CB of sub 20c is worth the *risk* based on P2O's
survival and minions' inability to run any investors off >> of course what the
real concern of master >> now >> is new eyes >> hence the *efforts* in play
cue >>> time to bury the post .. lol
4kids
the only *investor* who posts about *embedded signals* is moi
P2O has hundreds of other investors besides moi .. see why divert/deflect/twist
comes to mind
btw i'm also the investor who has noted *100s* of times that each person has
to know their own risk tolerance .. and have *clarity* in regards to their own DD
when it comes to PTOI
key for most *imo* will be BoD being seated
that will be the *signal* >> colluding entities >> CANT ignore
minions can check with master to ascertain what that *fact* entails
btw .. zero doubts that RH has pursued parallel paths re: P2O
any Ceo in his shoes (worth their salt would) but *leverage* re: price tag
requires *sales* of prox .. which was why my initial price target (btw we
both know national engineering company wouldn't be in the picture @
14 months + without founder's *flagship* >> doing exactly as claimed)
was (using 150M I/O) 300M$ to 600M$ (2.50 and 5.00 respectively)
but since then DD on *imo* backers of Eco and *overlap* with who i
believe to be the 2nd and 3rd buyers of prox .. (to say nothing of noting
all those top tier co.s getting into this technology) has me adjusting P2O's
price tag to a minimum of 1.2B$ >> quite possibly >> 2B$ (8.00 and 13.33)
and that is NOT including any *run for cover >> partial or otherwise*
so for at least this *actual* P2O investor >> risk/reward based on *realistic
timelines <6 years is flat out stunning for those who have actually worked
in a start up that transtions to successful early adopter> and *actual ongoing
DD* >> indicates to moi .. a CB of sub 20c is worth the *risk* based on P2O's
survival and minions' inability to run any investors off >> of course what the
real concern of master >> now >> is new eyes >> hence the *efforts* in play
cue >>> time to bury the post .. lol
4kids
