it's my opinion based on things ntek said that I'v
Post# of 4205
Posted On: 03/21/2015 12:36:07 PM
it's my opinion based on things ntek said that I've pointed out ad nauseam.
I'll go through it again, partially
2013 shm
audits and uplisting possibly within a year, np1 by eoy, working on channels for subscription such as wine channel and clubbentv, original series,
everything on Meows post
they created an atmosphere of exuberance that thry had to know was total bullshit, saying if things went as plannd they expected uplist and over a dollar a share within a year, which would have been a year ago.
is it true big and ntek and certain other insiders flipped and shorted using the knowledge that what they said couldn't possibly come true, as hindsight proves especially given the glaring knowledge that ntek and big kept saying the np1 would be in stores by xmas 2013, even days before then? when big finally admitted last june that the np1 he got last march was just a prototype? btw, that was the first time he admitted that, even though "bashers" , said that very thing when he got it and he continued to deny it till june. caught with his hand in the cookie jar. he got shares for 3 cents while they were running pps to 17 cents.
imo, only a fool could believe otherwise.
what other possible reason could there be for continuing to push something that we now know was false.
any it continues to this day with advertising campaigns that aren't there, award winning movies that never show up, supposedly because said studio owned movie is mysteriously held up because the studio that owns the movie is beholden to the director or producer, and holds up the studio deal? because he can't be bothered to review it? the studio that owns the movie puts up with this? according to ntek, it was announced last week it would've been out this week so it can't take that long to review.
plus big keeps posting falsehoods. he said last year he expected audits last year, then he backed off. just one example to go along with his misleading statements about the np1.
he knew about the spinoff months before it happened and supported it even though it screws us out of a HUGE! Fn reason i bought this scammy stock! It stinks to high heaven.
the excuses never stop and it strains credulity.
I've made no bones it's my opinion and i'm looking for other logical explanations that show another possibility.
but i'm not looking for simple statements dismissing my viewpoint with nothing to back it up. i may be farfetched, but looking back it's certainly possible.
ntek certainly does not a dam thing to shed a contrarian viewpoint.
I'll go through it again, partially
2013 shm
audits and uplisting possibly within a year, np1 by eoy, working on channels for subscription such as wine channel and clubbentv, original series,
everything on Meows post
they created an atmosphere of exuberance that thry had to know was total bullshit, saying if things went as plannd they expected uplist and over a dollar a share within a year, which would have been a year ago.
is it true big and ntek and certain other insiders flipped and shorted using the knowledge that what they said couldn't possibly come true, as hindsight proves especially given the glaring knowledge that ntek and big kept saying the np1 would be in stores by xmas 2013, even days before then? when big finally admitted last june that the np1 he got last march was just a prototype? btw, that was the first time he admitted that, even though "bashers" , said that very thing when he got it and he continued to deny it till june. caught with his hand in the cookie jar. he got shares for 3 cents while they were running pps to 17 cents.
imo, only a fool could believe otherwise.
what other possible reason could there be for continuing to push something that we now know was false.
any it continues to this day with advertising campaigns that aren't there, award winning movies that never show up, supposedly because said studio owned movie is mysteriously held up because the studio that owns the movie is beholden to the director or producer, and holds up the studio deal? because he can't be bothered to review it? the studio that owns the movie puts up with this? according to ntek, it was announced last week it would've been out this week so it can't take that long to review.
plus big keeps posting falsehoods. he said last year he expected audits last year, then he backed off. just one example to go along with his misleading statements about the np1.
he knew about the spinoff months before it happened and supported it even though it screws us out of a HUGE! Fn reason i bought this scammy stock! It stinks to high heaven.
the excuses never stop and it strains credulity.
I've made no bones it's my opinion and i'm looking for other logical explanations that show another possibility.
but i'm not looking for simple statements dismissing my viewpoint with nothing to back it up. i may be farfetched, but looking back it's certainly possible.
ntek certainly does not a dam thing to shed a contrarian viewpoint.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼