they are *protecting* 10c and are *reduced* to hav

they are *protecting* 10c and are *reduced* to having to access IB *daily*
for their >> fix

here's to 2 rounds of *obliteration* >> 12c to 15c (*crew has *major* financial
pain above 20c) and 30c to 40c for aromatics (who have far deeper pockets
to withstand financial pain)

*crew (both sides) that works the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation >> there

certain aromatics who (because they've done it b4) thought they could
capture P2O's IP for pennies on the $ .. which is why RH got no *honeymoon*
and PTOI has been relentlessly compressed via *resets* since their *arrival*
but most tellingly since mid August 2013 @ that 30c to 40c *range*

as i noted to a few P2O investors this past weekend

the signal always for an OTC targeted stock to be partially covered upward
is an indy BoD being seated (which imo happens this summer with P2O)

but i'll go out on a limb here with the *possibility* of a 2nd buyer in P2O's queue
being id'd and articulating *specifics* (as was done with Eco in Jan 2015)
we may well see certain aromatics >> decide to cover with 2nd buyer 8k'd

it will depend on the size of the deal >> if original template 8k'd re: Eco's agreements are
utilized (or amended) and actual date of 2nd buyer's *pilot* .. in relation to Eco's known pilot date of 5.1.15

if 2nd buyer is a game changer (imo 20 to 25 prox agreement) .. only the truly stupid aromatics
won't start their cover on PTOI @ 30c

just a reminder of why masters' minions can trot out that 99% stat by rote on SMBs

*master* can almost always *outlast* >> retail investors

nothing tho' can beat *educated* investors in the successful early adopter of a disruptor in an emerging sector

nothing

4kids