i was reminded of all those force fed posts on the

i was reminded of all those force fed posts on the PTOI board *there* about the A co.

which got me thinking about when specific minions first started posting

CON side of the crew (non interchangeable) entered on 9.9.09
>> one side of LONDON CALLING to be precise <<

most recent banee >> there

entered specific to the WN (and set up) >> in July 2011

ran across this little tidbit >> from most recent PTOI banee *there*
from a stay in the bighouse (their wording not mine) by *admin*

found it vastly *revealing* about what is known and by whom >> *there*


XX XXXXX [Xxxxxx] Member Level Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:51:34 AM
Re: arvitar post# 97447 Post # of 112823

I just reviewed your account and your history here.

This is the reality:

You have been here under various aliases hundreds of times. While I don't have the time or inclination to check the hundreds of deletions on those additional accounts, I did just review the last 50 removals under this account.

Whatever you want to try to make this about, 50% of your messages were removed on this account. In looking at the last 50, I saw maybe TWO that were selectively removed though not something I'd restore. Other than that, it was clear that you think it's important to talk about the Users who post on this site. That is, always has been and always will be against the rules here.

As you very well know, Users have the recourse to report messages that violate the TOU. You chose to abuse that feature, so it was disabled from your use on this account.

Are there flaws in the system? Absolutely. Do people abuse the system? Absolutely. Are there people with horrible agendas here? Absolutely. Are all messages that violate the TOU here removed? Absolutely not. Are all Moderators unbiased and do their very best to ensure every TOU violation is removed? Absolutely not.

No arguments on any of that. With 35k posts here daily, we do the best that we can within the tools we have, within the authority we have and within the guidelines set up here.

I, personally, consider the source, the history and the conduct of people who offer criticisms of the systems here. In your case, you clearly have chosen to ignore the rules here and it seems that instead of acknowledging that, you would now like to deflect from that and blame it on the people and systems on this site.

======

now you know why imo it's not worth the time or effort to *debate* with
those who've never found any stock worthy of investing in >> yet spend
every waking moment (via multiple aliases) posting on various SMBs
24/7/365

4kids