the last thing vehicle of choice wants is an educated retail
interesting thread that for the most part went *poof* ..
started with a post via that faux wannabe atty impersonating a *real* one
kaymeyer Saturday, 03/07/15 10:27:51 PM
Re: None
Post # of 279588
SEC CHARGES SCAM COMPANY AND ITS OFFICERS WITH FRAUD.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2012/lr22220.htm
====
Renz Sunday, 03/08/15 09:26:18 AM
Re: kaymeyer post# 279580
Post # of 279585
That's over 3 years ago, Kay. Don't you have anything more current?
Quote:
kaymeyer Saturday, 03/07/15 10:27:51 PM
Re: None
Post # of 279583
SEC CHARGES SCAM COMPANY AND ITS OFFICERS WITH FRAUD.
JBI, Inc., John Bordynuik and Ronald Baldwin, Jr.
====
fourkids_9pets Member Level Sunday, 03/08/15 10:15:29 AM
Re: A deleted message
Post # of 279587
even more telling with the dolts is their *behavior*
and their inability to *change* that which doesn't work specific to OTC co.s where P2O currently resides
what was that phrase attributed to einstein?
Quote:
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
anyone can run a check on the dolts (sec)
i just entered >> sec permanently enjoined >> and lo and behold >> lookie there
re: what google spit out
About 9,140,000 results (0.33 seconds)
now that is >> permanently pathetic >> and reveals a system that needs to be totally overhauled
of course they CANT >> because due to the sec's own *complicit and corrupt behavior* >> US Equities
would implode in total .. CANT have that happen any faster than what is scheduled in place already
discovery of the SEC (specific to that *letter* to P2O of 9.28.10) .. will be worth its weight in gold
now that to me is a tic toc moment for P2O investors
just one of the reasons i'm so curious to see how the *stock gets handled* going forward
Quote:
imo *potential for P2O's tech and ability to diversify*
specific to respective buyers' utilization requirements
is why i've always noted with *realistic time lines* and
how *handled* >> i'd expect a healthy triple digit stock
my time frame (not talking partially laddered cover with
BoD seated) is 2018 to 2020
i also suspect >> deployment escalates significantly within 1 year of uplisting (i.e. 2017)
my time line for P2O
2015 = transitional year .. first sales (plural consummated) >> footprints established >> BoD seated
2016 = Uplisting out of the OTC cesspool (new street savvy mgmt team) >> TSX as well with RH on BoD
2017 = Forward Split of stock .. quarterly cash divs by *rote*
2018 = successful early adopter within this emerging sector >> well established and known via analyst community
interesting thread that for the most part went *poof* ..
started with a post via that faux wannabe atty impersonating a *real* one
kaymeyer Saturday, 03/07/15 10:27:51 PM
Re: None
Post # of 279588
SEC CHARGES SCAM COMPANY AND ITS OFFICERS WITH FRAUD.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2012/lr22220.htm
====
Renz Sunday, 03/08/15 09:26:18 AM
Re: kaymeyer post# 279580
Post # of 279585
That's over 3 years ago, Kay. Don't you have anything more current?
Quote:
kaymeyer Saturday, 03/07/15 10:27:51 PM
Re: None
Post # of 279583
SEC CHARGES SCAM COMPANY AND ITS OFFICERS WITH FRAUD.
JBI, Inc., John Bordynuik and Ronald Baldwin, Jr.
====
fourkids_9pets Member Level Sunday, 03/08/15 10:15:29 AM
Re: A deleted message
Post # of 279587
even more telling with the dolts is their *behavior*
and their inability to *change* that which doesn't work specific to OTC co.s where P2O currently resides
what was that phrase attributed to einstein?
Quote:
"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
anyone can run a check on the dolts (sec)
i just entered >> sec permanently enjoined >> and lo and behold >> lookie there
re: what google spit out
About 9,140,000 results (0.33 seconds)
now that is >> permanently pathetic >> and reveals a system that needs to be totally overhauled
of course they CANT >> because due to the sec's own *complicit and corrupt behavior* >> US Equities
would implode in total .. CANT have that happen any faster than what is scheduled in place already
discovery of the SEC (specific to that *letter* to P2O of 9.28.10) .. will be worth its weight in gold
now that to me is a tic toc moment for P2O investors
just one of the reasons i'm so curious to see how the *stock gets handled* going forward
Quote:
imo *potential for P2O's tech and ability to diversify*
specific to respective buyers' utilization requirements
is why i've always noted with *realistic time lines* and
how *handled* >> i'd expect a healthy triple digit stock
my time frame (not talking partially laddered cover with
BoD seated) is 2018 to 2020
i also suspect >> deployment escalates significantly within 1 year of uplisting (i.e. 2017)
my time line for P2O
2015 = transitional year .. first sales (plural consummated) >> footprints established >> BoD seated
2016 = Uplisting out of the OTC cesspool (new street savvy mgmt team) >> TSX as well with RH on BoD
2017 = Forward Split of stock .. quarterly cash divs by *rote*
2018 = successful early adopter within this emerging sector >> well established and known via analyst community
