"So no facts or links to dispute? Nothing that dis
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 02/20/2015 11:18:52 AM
"So no facts or links to dispute? Nothing that disproves any of that? Nothing to discredit validations by Crayola, US Steel, Isle Chem, SAIC, NYSDEC, Coco Paving, GM, Greg Wilkinson, American Scientific Council, Discovery Channel and countless other eyewitnesses. Anything to prove Richard Heddle has ever lied, cheated or stolen from shareholders? Something that proves the company is "shutdown" and processor sales were NOT completed. Anything, one shred of verifiable evidence other then pointing out the PPS?"
- Rakestar
This is exactly what I'm talking about--there is this culture on the message boards which is fostered by a number of posters. It basically demands that skeptics without any ties to the company nor any access to test the plant, provide evidence that the company is a scam...while giving the company a complete pass on providing any credible evidence that any of its claims are true.
Even with SAIC, investors found out later that the analysis was dependent on undisclosed management assumptions and PTOI stated investors shouldn't rely on it. Rakestar is being entirely dishonest by suggesting validation by those entities--he's trying to deceive people.
I can certainly show that, pound for pound, the scrap plastics needed by PTOI will cost more than the most expensive petroleum fuel product. That should be enough. If it's not enough then why not ask PTOI directly whether they've found any situation where plastic is converted into something more valuable since PTOI is not taking any initiative to describe their value proposition to investors??
If you buy a penny stock without a company providing evidence of their value and feel validation consists of no skeptic being able to disprove it, you're going to find yourself in the same money-losing boat over and over. There are con men like Mr. Bordynuik everywhere in penny stocks and they love taking your money. There are unethical assistants to con men like Mr. Heddle everywhere who have a financial incentive to keep investors duped, as omitting the fact that the plant was broken for six months testifies.
- Rakestar
This is exactly what I'm talking about--there is this culture on the message boards which is fostered by a number of posters. It basically demands that skeptics without any ties to the company nor any access to test the plant, provide evidence that the company is a scam...while giving the company a complete pass on providing any credible evidence that any of its claims are true.
Even with SAIC, investors found out later that the analysis was dependent on undisclosed management assumptions and PTOI stated investors shouldn't rely on it. Rakestar is being entirely dishonest by suggesting validation by those entities--he's trying to deceive people.
I can certainly show that, pound for pound, the scrap plastics needed by PTOI will cost more than the most expensive petroleum fuel product. That should be enough. If it's not enough then why not ask PTOI directly whether they've found any situation where plastic is converted into something more valuable since PTOI is not taking any initiative to describe their value proposition to investors??
If you buy a penny stock without a company providing evidence of their value and feel validation consists of no skeptic being able to disprove it, you're going to find yourself in the same money-losing boat over and over. There are con men like Mr. Bordynuik everywhere in penny stocks and they love taking your money. There are unethical assistants to con men like Mr. Heddle everywhere who have a financial incentive to keep investors duped, as omitting the fact that the plant was broken for six months testifies.
(0)
(0)Plastic2Oil, Inc. (PTOI) Stock Research Links
Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.