I take it that the Flatpack licensing is their mai
Post# of 9144
Posted On: 02/17/2015 3:42:20 PM
Re: Machiavelli20 #1343
I take it that the Flatpack licensing is their main focus again. What is their point? Answer is they don't have one. They're just throwing out the same old line hoping for a nibble. All their labor to plant this particular seed of doubt and it hasn't taken root, yet they continue to try. Why? Because they have nothing better to do. They gotta get paid for something and since nothing's working for them right now, re-emphasizing nothing is the best they can do. It doesn't help them that there isn't anything they can focus on that might drive investors to thinking that the CEO is a crook.
Why don't they explain why the CEO giving EXCLUSIVE license of the Flatpack to Nanologix is bad for investors? Its obvious to me that selling the license to every interested company would be the fastest way to make money for myself if I held the patent. Why isn't the CEO doing this? Heck, why hasn't he sold the patent to the highest bidder?
The CEO's actions does not reflect the picture they are trying to paint of him. Some may question why I have been such an ardent supporter of the CEO. It is precisely this -- I've focused on his actions since taking over and came to believe early on that he is truly interested and invested in making Nanologix into a legitimate and very successful company. It hasn't hurt that he's proven himself to be an intelligent problem solver with all these very valuable patents in a field he was previously not involved in and practical in moving the Company to where it is with a very clean balance sheet.
I think time may finally be on our side. They haven't been able to or are too afraid to knock down the share price as aggressively as they have before. The longer they wait, the harder it gets as the days, weeks and months go on and more good news is released. Best they can do is keep the pressure on and hope for a misstep that they can twist to their benefit. I wonder if that's how all the winners in this game of life won -- hoped/wished/prayed for their opponents to make mistakes?
Why don't they explain why the CEO giving EXCLUSIVE license of the Flatpack to Nanologix is bad for investors? Its obvious to me that selling the license to every interested company would be the fastest way to make money for myself if I held the patent. Why isn't the CEO doing this? Heck, why hasn't he sold the patent to the highest bidder?
The CEO's actions does not reflect the picture they are trying to paint of him. Some may question why I have been such an ardent supporter of the CEO. It is precisely this -- I've focused on his actions since taking over and came to believe early on that he is truly interested and invested in making Nanologix into a legitimate and very successful company. It hasn't hurt that he's proven himself to be an intelligent problem solver with all these very valuable patents in a field he was previously not involved in and practical in moving the Company to where it is with a very clean balance sheet.
I think time may finally be on our side. They haven't been able to or are too afraid to knock down the share price as aggressively as they have before. The longer they wait, the harder it gets as the days, weeks and months go on and more good news is released. Best they can do is keep the pressure on and hope for a misstep that they can twist to their benefit. I wonder if that's how all the winners in this game of life won -- hoped/wished/prayed for their opponents to make mistakes?
(0)
(0)