its a penny stock -if u want 100 dollar/share disc
Post# of 9144
Posted On: 02/16/2015 11:51:52 AM
its a penny stock -if u want 100 dollar/share disclosure then buy a 100 dollar /share stock
is there a statement on the website? somewhere else in many pages of docs online?
how much of the revenues come from the flat pack license?
bashers are always intimating co's should publish their contracts - not even blue chips usually do that
NNLX publishes its financials in greater depth than even many pink current stocks- even if they are not GAAP - so revenues listed in such belong to NNLX
would be nice to see a statement on the license issue = maybe there is somewhere- we have had statements on this board and elsewhere, but, knowing the slant of a certain persons posts, dont subliminally imply some type of subterfuge
i would expect upgrading to current pink as revenues allow (its 4200/year to be part of OTC's disclosure service) at some point in the near future and at that point- if not sooner- we will have more details
if Bret were planning on keeping the license exclusively to himself, operating a public company- w all the many headaches that result from a public company- would be foolish
since Bret is a major stockholder its logical Bret would eventually benefit from granting an exclusive license to NNLX without running an operation by himself
is there a statement on the website? somewhere else in many pages of docs online?
how much of the revenues come from the flat pack license?
bashers are always intimating co's should publish their contracts - not even blue chips usually do that
NNLX publishes its financials in greater depth than even many pink current stocks- even if they are not GAAP - so revenues listed in such belong to NNLX
would be nice to see a statement on the license issue = maybe there is somewhere- we have had statements on this board and elsewhere, but, knowing the slant of a certain persons posts, dont subliminally imply some type of subterfuge
i would expect upgrading to current pink as revenues allow (its 4200/year to be part of OTC's disclosure service) at some point in the near future and at that point- if not sooner- we will have more details
if Bret were planning on keeping the license exclusively to himself, operating a public company- w all the many headaches that result from a public company- would be foolish
since Bret is a major stockholder its logical Bret would eventually benefit from granting an exclusive license to NNLX without running an operation by himself
(0)
(0)