I think it's because many have had to sell shares for personal financial reasons. Sorry if I'm speaking out of my backside Tonto. I know that a lot of us really believed most of the information that we were hearing about this company from the NTEK team, so we took it as something that was in the works and believed the stock had the potential to increase exponentially. They obviously had no idea that shares were going to be down like they are, so the "dollar a share" bit was taken with a grain of salt for sure. However, they also knew damned well that some of the things they were saying were absolute falsehoods. So many here have had to sell shares at tremendous losses to cover various financial issues. It just galls me a little bit that there was no accountability for all the things those at NTEK were doing if you ask me.
I am completely on board with hoping the management changes and the company changes are able to bring this company back to the levels of trust we thought we should have with them in 2013, but I'm a little skeptical about that time with hindsight considering that we don't have any idea what was true and what was false. Some of the things they were supposed to be doing just kind of disappeared into the ether and we have no idea what happened. I'm really hoping there is *more* transparency, honestly, and communication. The SHL seemed like a good start, and I hope it continues along that same path.
Can I ask you a question? I know you went to the site and felt even more like this was a good investment. Was there anything in particular that has convinced you to continue to buy into the company after you went there despite all the things that are brought up on this board? I say this board because I think there are legitimate questions that get asked here, rather than straight-out bashing on the other site. Primarily we are all investors that want NTEK to do well, so we are questioning what is being told to the public. Even with the misinformation we have gotten over the years, what is still telling you that this is a good enough investment to continue to buy into it? Personally I do think it's got tremendous potential, but I also think that the practices over the past year or two has taken that potential down a few notches due to the misleading information they have given, or flat out lies that they have told us as well. NP-1 dates, Ciao, content availability...all these things are really good questions. I hope that things change drastically with the new CEO, but the content still isn't flowing like they said it would, and they still have content that's not available from a PR two months ago. I want them to succeed so we all succeed, but it does seem like they've been shooting their trustworthiness in the foot by telling us all these things were going to happen, then no one will say anything about them when questioned about it.
I am completely on board with hoping the management changes and the company changes are able to bring this company back to the levels of trust we thought we should have with them in 2013, but I'm a little skeptical about that time with hindsight considering that we don't have any idea what was true and what was false. Some of the things they were supposed to be doing just kind of disappeared into the ether and we have no idea what happened. I'm really hoping there is *more* transparency, honestly, and communication. The SHL seemed like a good start, and I hope it continues along that same path.
Can I ask you a question? I know you went to the site and felt even more like this was a good investment. Was there anything in particular that has convinced you to continue to buy into the company after you went there despite all the things that are brought up on this board? I say this board because I think there are legitimate questions that get asked here, rather than straight-out bashing on the other site. Primarily we are all investors that want NTEK to do well, so we are questioning what is being told to the public. Even with the misinformation we have gotten over the years, what is still telling you that this is a good enough investment to continue to buy into it? Personally I do think it's got tremendous potential, but I also think that the practices over the past year or two has taken that potential down a few notches due to the misleading information they have given, or flat out lies that they have told us as well. NP-1 dates, Ciao, content availability...all these things are really good questions. I hope that things change drastically with the new CEO, but the content still isn't flowing like they said it would, and they still have content that's not available from a PR two months ago. I want them to succeed so we all succeed, but it does seem like they've been shooting their trustworthiness in the foot by telling us all these things were going to happen, then no one will say anything about them when questioned about it.
