again each person has to make those determinations
Post# of 43064
![Avatar](/images/ProfileImages/no_avatar_available.jpg)
since you track others' posts so assiduously .. track those that note *realistic*
time frames
what is a realistic time frame?
it will be different for each *investor* or *trader* based on their own *education and awareness*
then factor in *efforts* in aggregate working against X investment
doesn't matter these days if it's big board or OTC >> rot is endemic
courtesy of the paper tiger known as the sec aka dolts
i'm in the camp that does believe in DCA'ing shares if events warrant
i actually understood what RH's install as ceo in mid August 2013 meant
to say nothing of what his infusion of cash on 9.30.13 >> meant
i understood what the material events filed in 2014 >> meant
i'm reminded of when i listen to *big board* co.s (earnings' CC/s) of just how long
*it takes re: realistic time frames*
i will repeat .. the evolution of P2O's prox from table top to flagship >> is stunning
imo that window (2009-2013) .. will be cut in half for P2O's *transition* (2014-2015)
and there are 2 outcomes for (gasp) actual P2O investors
buyout or uplisting
all the rest is *noise* .. but have at it ..
because no one is selling .. and the only way any colluding entity is gonna get *sells*
is either by *running* PPS (pre material events)
or *raiding* PPS (and that time frame is a very short window en route >>> pun intended)
4kids
![Like This Post](/images/thumb-up.png)
![Dislike This Post](/images/thumb-down.png)