Well 2can you will most likely not get a reply on

Well 2can you will most likely not get a reply on his statements as he indicates below: No Shareholder will just HOLD their shares due to the 2 possible reasons that this poster listed. Psychology dictates that if these 2 reasons were true, the Shareholder would have sold and attempted to recover as much as possible of their investment before they loose more, unless they are already too far down and hope for the "Hale Mary" potential of the stock popping. No one wants to loose money just to teach themselves a lesson of deception as he indicates and No one needs shares in order to confront the company for promoting unverified potential. So I believe he is just attempting to deceive the public and any new possible investors.


""Current shareholders may hold their shares for many reasons. One of these may be that it allows them to remain invested spectators of a potential lesson in an orchestrated attempt in deception. The other reason may be that it gives one the right to confront those promoting unverified potential of DUTV. And there's always the "Hail Mary" potential of the stock popping...

Either way it certainly livens up the debate while we all wait for McHenry to actually provide proof of DUTV revenue production. And I mean real, verifiable, 3rd party confirmable proof.

Until then we'll continue to see a lot of zibber zabber about the IP markets that DUTV "might" be in at the same time that we see DUTV's pps stagnate in the triple zeros. ""

"The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."