Is the second harmonic method applicable for thin
Post# of 22467
Posted On: 02/03/2015 12:20:53 PM
Is the second harmonic method applicable for thin films mechanical properties characterization by nanoindentation?
The second harmonic method is a dynamic indentation technique independent of the direct indentation depth measurement. It can be used to determine near-surface mechanical properties of bulk materials more precisely than classical dynamic nano-indentation. In this paper, the second harmonic method is extended to the measurement of the mechanical properties of thin PMMA layers deposited onto silicon wafers. It is shown that this new technique gives precise results at small depths (less than 100nm), even for films with a thickness lower than 500nm, which was not possible to achieve with the classical CSM method. However, experimental and numerical results obtained both with classical nanoindentation and second harmonic methods differ at high indentation depth. Using FE simulations and AFM measurements, it is shown that the contact depth calculation with classical models can explain this difference .
http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00379
The second harmonic method is a dynamic indentation technique independent of the direct indentation depth measurement. It can be used to determine near-surface mechanical properties of bulk materials more precisely than classical dynamic nano-indentation. In this paper, the second harmonic method is extended to the measurement of the mechanical properties of thin PMMA layers deposited onto silicon wafers. It is shown that this new technique gives precise results at small depths (less than 100nm), even for films with a thickness lower than 500nm, which was not possible to achieve with the classical CSM method. However, experimental and numerical results obtained both with classical nanoindentation and second harmonic methods differ at high indentation depth. Using FE simulations and AFM measurements, it is shown that the contact depth calculation with classical models can explain this difference .
http://arxiv.org/abs/1502.00379
(0)
(0)