i guess on the other hand since their DD sux so ba
Post# of 43064
and they were convinced one of Eco's mgmt and a P2O shareholder
were one and the same for the last month >> that falsehood will
now be corrected .. then again .. that requires functioning gray matter
notice they still can't post who the national firm is >> their known id blows conditioning
by rote bogus bs to smithereens
notice they still haven't explored the *diversity and leverage* behind EcoNav
that too presents a problem for their monosyllabic rants
and regarding ACC as has been noted a few x over ... yep there is a cost
associated with them
zero doubts when RH has the cash to spare .. P2O will be a member of
the CON side working the vehicle of choice really needs to seriously *regroup*
(good luck with that) >> they embarrass themselves daily these days
4kids