yeah i get the *drill* that anyone who isn't in CO

yeah i get the *drill* that anyone who isn't in CONtention for medaling
in the whining category about their *losses* .....

sorry but my PTOI CB (cost basis) heads closer to 10c these days than 20c

i realize that it's difficult to adjust thinking embedded year's deep
but the reality is P2O survived ..

no business is stagnant .. which is why i focus on what the current CEO has
stated since mid August 2013 ..

and he's not exactly known for hyperbole

there are only 2 outcomes in play re: the company (P2O)

just my logic here >> but if *sold* it will be above what *originals* paid (80c)
i realize you don't interact with any of them .. but i do and i have with many
since 2012 ..

the ACC Executive Summary (10.9.14) .. indicates what is en route $ wise
for this emerging sector .. i've already gone on record that *imo* the price tag
for P2O's buyout will be between 300Milliion and 600Million, which works out
to approx 2.50 to 5.00 per share

that is one option ..

the other option as i've also articulated

is that RH seats the BoD >> after first pilot is *consummated* and pipeline reveals 2nd buyer ..
money is the bank .. tools utilized for ambulance chasers get the sign off
via the judge .. AGM is held .. RH steps aside as Ceo .. BoD *sources*
a new (street savvy) mgmt team .. and P2O (company) uplists in 2016

which is why the colluding entities that have worked the *stock* since 2009

have a dilemma of their own making to *partially* solve ..

in my experience they never cover one second b4 they are forced to do so
and even then if the time frame runs out 3 to 4Qs from BoD seated to uplisting
out of the cesspool .. they will *imo* do what i call a partially laddered cover
that works the stock up approx 25% .. then *resets* back 10 to 15% .. then
up 25% .. and so it will go

they will *make* PTOI >> a *trading stock* .. vs having their stooges complain
about how *illiquid* it is ..

the one thing master might want to remember ..

there are a few ways to cause signifcant pain ..

one of which pertains to cash divs ..

i can see if this pilot is a template for *most* prox buyers in the pipeline

royalties that translate into quarterlies .. 2016 also works for that

so master can disregard .. disruptive tech .. emerging sector and *currently*
the only game in town (ie early adopter) .. at their cost ..

first 3 entries in this sector .. will do just fine .. but they actually have to be pubcos
that *file* with the dolts >> so the analyst community can do *realistic* comps

imo it's game over by EO 2nd Q 2015 (6.30.15)
because *others* understand exactly what the flagship is capable of

4kids