Yes i was just about to post this showing WOLV's 1
Post# of 876
Posted On: 01/28/2015 2:16:13 PM
Yes i was just about to post this showing WOLV's 10k was audited- which is better than an attorney current info cert letter - and 10Q's are not required by OTC etc to be audited-so WOLV should not need an attorney current info cert letter -
but since OTC lists WOLV as ''limited info'' I was trying to sleuth why-
the other reason I can think of is OTC might just be waiting for BSCS to officially withdraw their Oct 8 order
but when it comes to removing ce's OTC usually requires additional things at least of non-SEC reporting co's- whether OTC will require something additional in this unique case i dont know- I've never seen a ce imposed for the unique reason WOLV experienced -merely a delay in reporting under stricter BC standards which would NOT have resulted in a ce if WOLV were a USA co
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Wolverine Exploration, Inc.
Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Wolverine Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”) as of May 31, 2014 and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of May 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company suffered losses from operations and has a working capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
MaloneBailey, LLP
www.malonebailey.com
Houston, Texas
December 16, 2014
but since OTC lists WOLV as ''limited info'' I was trying to sleuth why-
the other reason I can think of is OTC might just be waiting for BSCS to officially withdraw their Oct 8 order
but when it comes to removing ce's OTC usually requires additional things at least of non-SEC reporting co's- whether OTC will require something additional in this unique case i dont know- I've never seen a ce imposed for the unique reason WOLV experienced -merely a delay in reporting under stricter BC standards which would NOT have resulted in a ce if WOLV were a USA co
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Wolverine Exploration, Inc.
Quesnel, British Columbia, Canada
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Wolverine Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”) as of May 31, 2014 and the related statements of operations, shareholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of May 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company suffered losses from operations and has a working capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters also are described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
MaloneBailey, LLP
www.malonebailey.com
Houston, Texas
December 16, 2014
(0)
(0)