davy obviously didn't care for you to prove you ow
Post# of 4205
Posted On: 01/27/2015 8:29:18 PM
davy obviously didn't care for you to prove you own shares through your account, which is the correct way. He wanted to know if you were a not towing the company line and asking uncomfortable questions, so he could deny you access, the same way we get deleted from other boards.
too bad we cant ask why they don't live up to promises when they say they will. more content added yesterday. at this rate we just might see those 50 titles promised for December sometime next month.
Then they can start working on the 200 titles promised for this month.
hmmm, that might be backwards dd to some. I think its cause some see me looking back and noting that ntek hasn't delivered on past promises. can anyone else think of another reason people call ntek not delivering on promises "backwards dd? Makes sense, right?
that's a good term! only wish I'd thought of it. Backwards dd. sometimes that's all you get, but its pretty good.
better dd than poffers, who, a year ago said np1 by feb on another board they moderate, and certainly better dd than them coming on this board and telling me that im "not too bright" for saying nteks current fiscal year is 2015 and therefore the poofers dd that said ntek would deliver 2014 audits within that year, was, um... "not too bright".
get sum!, backwards dd. cause sometimes you just cant trust a poofers dd.
too bad we cant ask why they don't live up to promises when they say they will. more content added yesterday. at this rate we just might see those 50 titles promised for December sometime next month.
Then they can start working on the 200 titles promised for this month.
hmmm, that might be backwards dd to some. I think its cause some see me looking back and noting that ntek hasn't delivered on past promises. can anyone else think of another reason people call ntek not delivering on promises "backwards dd? Makes sense, right?
that's a good term! only wish I'd thought of it. Backwards dd. sometimes that's all you get, but its pretty good.
better dd than poffers, who, a year ago said np1 by feb on another board they moderate, and certainly better dd than them coming on this board and telling me that im "not too bright" for saying nteks current fiscal year is 2015 and therefore the poofers dd that said ntek would deliver 2014 audits within that year, was, um... "not too bright".
get sum!, backwards dd. cause sometimes you just cant trust a poofers dd.
(0)
(0)