Why manipulation is responsible for the share pric
Post# of 9122
The share price would be MUCH higher than where it sits now if it weren't for the manipulation.
The one thing I am absolutely sure about is that on most days, the buy volume is absorbed by shares that are being shorted AT THE ASK; the exception sometimes being when there is strong buying on exceptionally good news that the manipulators don't have the balls to try to quell. The shorting at the ask is used for two purposes: 1) to cap any momentum and 2) to keep a drag on the share price to not lose too much of their progress in their goal to drive down to the stock price. Think of it like a fisherman trying to reel fish into the boat.
Typically, a short attack (aka bear raid) involves the offender collapsing the BID by selling shares short into it and taking their profits usually both by covering their short position and then buying to sell on the run up. Rinse repeat. This is manipulation to make a profit.
In the case for Nanologix, the manipulation is to kill the Company.
Sure there's been delays and setbacks along the way. But there have also been very positive news and progress toward profitability. The share price and its performance is manipulated to make it seem like there is only bad news.
Would the trend of the stock price be upward without the manipulation? Maybe.
Would the trend be a flat line?
Maybe.
Would the trend be downward...
Maybe.
...but at a much higher price?
F**K YEAH!!
So absolutely positively true that the share price is as low as it is due to the manipulation.