I agree with the philosophy. The problem for most

I agree with the philosophy. The problem for most involved is the total lack of transparency by the past and present BOD. In parallel with the lack of transparency is the SEC convincing all that fraud took place. Why wasn't this problem predicted and mitigated by the new BOD. The ongoing investigation was well known. That should have prompted SEC compliance as a first priority and not some pie in the sky Colorado deal or PRIVCO merger or dividends, etc. What a crock of chit all that was. We're those PR'S only fabricated to entice the additional buying of restricted shares? Was there ever one ounce of evidence that those milestones were remotely possible? I want to know if documentation, meetings, and negotiations were ever started on those milestones? I want answers! TECO'S CURRENT CEO OWES SHAREHOLDERS ANSWERS TO THOSE FAILED MILESTONES! IMO every PR to date has been no different since the January, 2012 PR and 8K claiming oil was struck in Belize. ZERO FILINGS, ZERO REVENUE, ZERO CURES TO SHARE STRUCTURE, ETC.