Even the manipulated understated practically useless twice monthly short report which gives mm's days and 12 ways (see 4kids9pets and 7-10-11's posts) to hide true shorts shows the following shorts
Nov 28, 2014 110,177 shorts 1,008.76 173,009 total volume
you completely misunderstand my posts
the penalties are for remaining non pink current when they transition to significant revenue because otc thinks any co that fails to upgrade to pink current is deceiving holders-so they clap ce on hundreds of such co's,and then other entities join the free for all
i've detailed those widespread commonly employed otc penalties at length before so research my posts
there are no otc penalties for failure to uplist- which is different than upgrading - from pink current to OTCQB
but the stock market via investor choice/comfort level levies a penalty on co's -the lower the stock classification on otc or otcqb vs OTCQX or big boards etc the greater the investor penalty and the smaller the investor pool and thus the lower the buy sell ratio- which is why non-current co's especially systemically have had a downward pps spiral since sept 2009
which is why the very very few market savvy penny ceos now upgrade in the new anti non-current political reality and or uplist to the highest classification they can afford- it brings net benefits by increasing investor pool, liquidity and thus pps increase over what pps would have been at a lower classification, esp because shorters target non current classes for many reasons-in short because such stocks have a 95% plus chance of pps decline,
in the last year the stock market has risen-blue chips on big boards have risen
blue chips -mostly foreign blues-have done less well on OTCQX- which has the same essential reporting standards as big boards but is less well known and many brokers dont even know about OTCQX-begun in 2009 because otc keeps raising requirements in a highly fluid situation and pushing co's to increase the level of their status- which is the next uplisting above OTCQB
meanwhile OTCQB co's -though SEC reporting and thus big boys -institutions can invest in such-have had a much harder time due to smaller investor pool and more shorters
and pinks have a much smaller investor pool than otcqb,esp limited info and no info
by the time u get down to no info status the investor pool is limited to core longs against a bevy of mad shorters bashers day traders technical traders -and when there are ebola PR's etc promo players/day traders who siphon money-such promos end up hurting co's pps in long term
thus i;m just saying the best and cheapest way the co can improve outlook and investor pool and buy sell ratio and long/shorter ratio and thus pps is by upgrading while preparing to uplist to OTCQB-they may be in the process of doing so-i dont know
NNLX current pps w their game changing technology ,ongoing and upcoming catalysts and financials -compared to other co's at this pps -is a steal -
but nobody but core longs know that because the investor pool is so small in the no info class in the current environment and investors can see no info on NNLX at otc so they wont even know about NNLX because they arent going to dig deep enough to find the website when they have no reason to do so re a no info co when there are thousands of current pinks plus OTCQB who are advertising their financials and their game plan via 10Q's and 10 K's
again NOT NOT attacking the co in any way-explaining systemic penny market realities and what NNLX needs to do imo from very hard experience ( 250,000 worth) to protect longs and the co and stop the non-intrinsic value pps slide that is experienced by 95-99% of no info co's,
co's need to change their otc status w the rapidly changing penny market,especially in their transition from development stage to significant revenues or otc will do the changing for them
their is a strong unconstitutional anti-business political push to eliminate no info co's - which has affected several thousands of pennies since 2009 via broker/dtc restrictions and to slap them all w a ce which otc does at a drop of a hat in the current political environment
thats why to eliminate a ce otc and dtc and brokers REQUIRE an upgrade to pink current and why dtc has attacked countless non-current co's without due process despite dtc's Nov 2013 whitepaper under pressure by congress to grant a semblance of due process
they are also trying to eliminate pps below 1c -they are trying to force all non current pennies to upgrade-so its much cheaper for co's to do so on their own initiative than wait for the tagteam gauntlet of penalties
Nov 28, 2014 110,177 shorts 1,008.76 173,009 total volume
you completely misunderstand my posts
the penalties are for remaining non pink current when they transition to significant revenue because otc thinks any co that fails to upgrade to pink current is deceiving holders-so they clap ce on hundreds of such co's,and then other entities join the free for all
i've detailed those widespread commonly employed otc penalties at length before so research my posts
there are no otc penalties for failure to uplist- which is different than upgrading - from pink current to OTCQB
but the stock market via investor choice/comfort level levies a penalty on co's -the lower the stock classification on otc or otcqb vs OTCQX or big boards etc the greater the investor penalty and the smaller the investor pool and thus the lower the buy sell ratio- which is why non-current co's especially systemically have had a downward pps spiral since sept 2009
which is why the very very few market savvy penny ceos now upgrade in the new anti non-current political reality and or uplist to the highest classification they can afford- it brings net benefits by increasing investor pool, liquidity and thus pps increase over what pps would have been at a lower classification, esp because shorters target non current classes for many reasons-in short because such stocks have a 95% plus chance of pps decline,
in the last year the stock market has risen-blue chips on big boards have risen
blue chips -mostly foreign blues-have done less well on OTCQX- which has the same essential reporting standards as big boards but is less well known and many brokers dont even know about OTCQX-begun in 2009 because otc keeps raising requirements in a highly fluid situation and pushing co's to increase the level of their status- which is the next uplisting above OTCQB
meanwhile OTCQB co's -though SEC reporting and thus big boys -institutions can invest in such-have had a much harder time due to smaller investor pool and more shorters
and pinks have a much smaller investor pool than otcqb,esp limited info and no info
by the time u get down to no info status the investor pool is limited to core longs against a bevy of mad shorters bashers day traders technical traders -and when there are ebola PR's etc promo players/day traders who siphon money-such promos end up hurting co's pps in long term
thus i;m just saying the best and cheapest way the co can improve outlook and investor pool and buy sell ratio and long/shorter ratio and thus pps is by upgrading while preparing to uplist to OTCQB-they may be in the process of doing so-i dont know
NNLX current pps w their game changing technology ,ongoing and upcoming catalysts and financials -compared to other co's at this pps -is a steal -
but nobody but core longs know that because the investor pool is so small in the no info class in the current environment and investors can see no info on NNLX at otc so they wont even know about NNLX because they arent going to dig deep enough to find the website when they have no reason to do so re a no info co when there are thousands of current pinks plus OTCQB who are advertising their financials and their game plan via 10Q's and 10 K's
again NOT NOT attacking the co in any way-explaining systemic penny market realities and what NNLX needs to do imo from very hard experience ( 250,000 worth) to protect longs and the co and stop the non-intrinsic value pps slide that is experienced by 95-99% of no info co's,
co's need to change their otc status w the rapidly changing penny market,especially in their transition from development stage to significant revenues or otc will do the changing for them
their is a strong unconstitutional anti-business political push to eliminate no info co's - which has affected several thousands of pennies since 2009 via broker/dtc restrictions and to slap them all w a ce which otc does at a drop of a hat in the current political environment
thats why to eliminate a ce otc and dtc and brokers REQUIRE an upgrade to pink current and why dtc has attacked countless non-current co's without due process despite dtc's Nov 2013 whitepaper under pressure by congress to grant a semblance of due process
they are also trying to eliminate pps below 1c -they are trying to force all non current pennies to upgrade-so its much cheaper for co's to do so on their own initiative than wait for the tagteam gauntlet of penalties
