Mr. Heddle is being vague for a reason. He's ante'

Quote:

---

Mr. Heddle is being vague for a reason. He's ante'd up a lot of money so he has a strong interest in following Mr. Bordynuik's lead in lying to investors.

---

That's a complete fabrication, quite a stretch even for a storyteller like yourself. The narrative you strive to project as "rational" and "reasoned" is merely one person's opinion, as are all of your musings here. Heddle's interest in the company's success grows as his (and his company's) equity stake increases. You are in no position to be an authority on what motivates Heddle to do what he does unless he routinely confides in you; does he? That would be news indeed....

Quote:

---

Neither of the two people running PTOI appear to have any interest in doing their fiduciary duty to shareholders. You can scream and yell at me for saying so, but I'm not your problem.

---

Nobody is screaming or yelling at you, PP; they barely know you're even here. They might banter with you more if you didn't take every opportunity to re-post pages of the same contrived guesswork that you've been posting here for years.

This storyline is getting even less traction than your "simple math" theory on why PTOI wouldn't work, something that I didn't think was possible. Of course, you might succeed in lowering that bar further if you continue to try and resurrect the "media credits" as an issue......