Update on patent application 13/350127. As I p
Post# of 9144
Posted On: 12/05/2014 9:45:37 AM
Update on patent application 13/350127.
As I previously noted here just a few days ago, the application above had received a non-final rejection with most of the claims allowed and a few dependent claims rejected under 35 usc 112. For those not familiar with the process, those rejections are made with regard to legal issues and essentially formatting rather than the actual invention.
As expected, they have filed an amendment to clear that up which can now be seen in uspto pair.
What this means is that assuming the amendments are ok (they simply deleted the subject matter in question, so they should be) we should be able to expect an allowance shortly.
This is the bnp patent that uses aptamers to cut down on detection time I believe. Very important to the company in my opinion.
As I previously noted here just a few days ago, the application above had received a non-final rejection with most of the claims allowed and a few dependent claims rejected under 35 usc 112. For those not familiar with the process, those rejections are made with regard to legal issues and essentially formatting rather than the actual invention.
As expected, they have filed an amendment to clear that up which can now be seen in uspto pair.
What this means is that assuming the amendments are ok (they simply deleted the subject matter in question, so they should be) we should be able to expect an allowance shortly.
This is the bnp patent that uses aptamers to cut down on detection time I believe. Very important to the company in my opinion.
(0)
(0)