Shabby, my post of the CEO's reply to my email is
Post# of 9145
Posted On: 12/02/2014 11:51:37 AM
Shabby, my post of the CEO's reply to my email is not meant to inform you of his homes nor is it meant to pump the share price.
What do you feel is 'huge' news? I thought we had several huge news items this past year, but the share price has not reflected any of it. Are you thinking buyout? Partnership with Big Pharma? Profitability? Such news would pump up the stock of ANY small company. Do you believe that only news of such magnitude should warrant a rise in share price? Or should these highest of bars be only applicable to Nanologix?
There are many companies with much less potential than Nanologix that have better stock performance. There are also many companies that have poor stock performance, some of which deserve it due to corrupt management who serve their own interests. And then there are companies like Nanologix -- a Company that has obviously been targeted for destruction. Anyone believing this or at least acknowledging the possibility of it should not be surprised by what's happened and what will continue to happen. Such investors have every right to be frustrated, but should be judicious about how they express it and where they lay blame.
The efforts of those intent on the destruction of Nanologix has been to twist the minds of otherwise rational investors into believing that only the greatest of news should warrant an arrest of the decline in share price AS PAR FOR THE COURSE. Investors need to step back, take a breath and put things into perspective.
What do you feel is 'huge' news? I thought we had several huge news items this past year, but the share price has not reflected any of it. Are you thinking buyout? Partnership with Big Pharma? Profitability? Such news would pump up the stock of ANY small company. Do you believe that only news of such magnitude should warrant a rise in share price? Or should these highest of bars be only applicable to Nanologix?
There are many companies with much less potential than Nanologix that have better stock performance. There are also many companies that have poor stock performance, some of which deserve it due to corrupt management who serve their own interests. And then there are companies like Nanologix -- a Company that has obviously been targeted for destruction. Anyone believing this or at least acknowledging the possibility of it should not be surprised by what's happened and what will continue to happen. Such investors have every right to be frustrated, but should be judicious about how they express it and where they lay blame.
The efforts of those intent on the destruction of Nanologix has been to twist the minds of otherwise rational investors into believing that only the greatest of news should warrant an arrest of the decline in share price AS PAR FOR THE COURSE. Investors need to step back, take a breath and put things into perspective.
(0)
(0)