TNL, it's called "Tortious Interference" and it's

TNL, it's called "Tortious Interference" and it's against the law. The problem is the free speech amendment and the definition of what constitutes "opinion" on a message board. It's up to Cruz and Calkin to have these types silenced. It is very difficult and time consuming and obviously distracting for them to do so. The shorters, off shore hedge funds and competitors who want pressure on GRCU's PPS know that the GRCU BOD have better things to do. If they perform and prove the bashers wrong then the PPS will come out in the wash. This is why I harp on "credibility" i.e. if they give a date then they need to stick with the date. If they announce a milestone then they need to achieve that milestone or stay silent. The less these bashers have to work with the better but they will always find facts to twist and old dirt to dig up no matter how small a matter that "dirt" is. IMO GRCU should have their own "plant" on the boards i.e. a shareholder with just enough information that can contradict as much basher material as possible while not providing insider information or saying too much.

Tortious interference
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tortious interference, also known as intentional interference with contractual relations, in the common law of torts, occurs when a person intentionally damages the plaintiff's contractual or other business relationships. This tort is broadly divided into two categories, one specific to contractual relationships (irrespective of whether they involve business), and the other specific to business relationships or activities (irrespective of whether they involve a contract).