for any new eyes .. not really understanding the c

for any new eyes .. not really understanding the correlation of an orchestrated OTC stock

it goes like this ..

via the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation >> a cycle of money is
undertaken

that means stock is first front loaded over months by the PRO side of this *entity*

then then CON side of this entity >> enters (9.9.09) >> months after PRO side has
and the *DRAMA* gets underway by noise (lots of posts)

stock gets *RUN* (Dec 2009)

if one actually trax *trading data* >> one notes quickly *volume* in relation to PPS

with PTOI >> it's remarkable what is revealed by *lack* of volume in Dec 2009
say compared to other *revealing* time frames re: PTOI's *cycles*

so with first orchestrated RUN done >> CON side enters in total (Feb 2010)
to start the short down .. only no one in this brain trust ever did the DD
about who was invested *originally* and where those certs where *held*

enter next round >> 3 events that would overlap >> with only 2 known in RT

first hit piece authored (July 2010)
LONDON CALLING >> CSTI to aid and abet NN .. (July 2010)
and that non public letter to co.s founder courtesy of the *dolts* on 9.28.10

this FILTH .. is so used to owning all outcomes (see above) that they had to
resort to something even more revealing with P2O by both mid 2011 and
mid 2012

GOAL is always to force *DILUTION* out of MGMT .. which will usually result
in the almost always requisite R/S for any legit OTC co. to *survive* FILTHs' attention

notice what RH and JB have done in their roles as CEO
they've actually COUNTERED this FILTH .. by controlling P2O's SS

and that is why the ANGST has ratcheted up so noticeably on various social media sites like SMBs

sorry my being an investor in P2O via PTOI for over 5 years .. actually understanding
all aspects pertaining to the OTC cesspool (including my risk tolerance)

gives CONcern to masters' minions

2 outcomes in play re: P2O and either outcome >> PROvides *VINDICATION*
(threshold)
and financially benefits any P2O investor

yesterday's UPDATE revealed to me that whomever worked the latest angle re: October 2014's PTOI *volume*

isn't getting P2O's tech for pennies on the dollar >> as they'd *anticipated*

RH clearly recognizes what the ACC does >> re: this emerging/disruptive tech
being worth BILLIONS

dots aren't all that difficult to CONnect

4kids