How many here know that the claims owned by Canwea
Post# of 2102
johnnycomelately9 Tuesday, 11/18/14 02:20:18 PM
Re: EarnestDD post# 51395
Post # of 51416
If only they warned about the real danger, ihub.
How many here know that the claims owned by Canwealth were 1st explored and assessed by Quebec's Mining Ministrie in 2006? How many know that the numbers agree with the inferred reserves you mention? Which is why Kelly Taylor claimed them! How many also know that the company took only surface samples from our claims and sent them to AGAT and AGAT told them, you got billions in the ground pals? Truth is, people can discredit ICBT all they want, but I know that USG1 shareholders just signed forms to make their Canwealth shares unrestricted. So you can spend your life trying to scare people but the IPO is coming... No lie can stop it. ICBT market cap will instantly gain value over 10 million since their the largest partner, so PPS will soon follow. If we ever recover the inferred reserves you speak of, market cap will grow and be 700 million to billions... Yes, that's a fact! Know what you own shareholders; don't let them shake your shares loose in the trips... Volume is low now because they have to hit the ASK a lot higher but think they can still bid & trick... tik-tok to the games, can you hear the IPO? Do some earnest DD please!
Quote:We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.
In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)( of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, for complying with new or revised accounting standards. In other words, an “emerging growth company” can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We are choosing to take advantage of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. As a result, our financial statements may not be comparable to those of companies that comply with public company effective dates.
We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, although we will lose that status sooner if our revenues exceed $1 billion, if we issue more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt in a three year period, or if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million.