Posted on iHub in response to Kaymeyer and here fo
Post# of 5282
Posted On: 11/13/2014 4:14:55 PM
Posted on iHub in response to Kaymeyer and here for posterity. If they find a premise to delete the post, I'll have to re-word and post again:
- Telvue has no short interest and all the wishful >>>CONspiracy thinking will not change this fact.
- Those who have invested in Telvue have lost up to 90% of their stake and these losses are expected to continue.
- Telvue does not report with the SEC and it is claimed that in order to receive information about the company, one must sign a non disclosure agreement. This may cause an investor to run afoul of insider trading statutes in relation to trading "on the basis of" non public material information. Insider trading is punishable by steep fines and prison sentences. Best to consult with an attorney.
My rebuttal:
1. Neither side seems to be able to definitely prove anything in relation to shorts other than providing links to sites that each side refutes. I'll leave arguing the toss amongst yourselves.
2. The shareholders I converse with have not lost anywhere near 90% including myself. You state you "expect the losses to continue". But then you've also expected sub $1.00 share price for almost a year now and still waiting.
3. That's a lot of if's and maybe's with a whole lot of here say and opinion. If the SEC wished to contact or even charge me or other shareholders with insider trading, we're still waiting as the years tick by.
has no short interest and all the wishful >>>CONspiracy thinking will not change this fact.
- Telvue has no short interest and all the wishful >>>CONspiracy thinking will not change this fact.
- Those who have invested in Telvue have lost up to 90% of their stake and these losses are expected to continue.
- Telvue does not report with the SEC and it is claimed that in order to receive information about the company, one must sign a non disclosure agreement. This may cause an investor to run afoul of insider trading statutes in relation to trading "on the basis of" non public material information. Insider trading is punishable by steep fines and prison sentences. Best to consult with an attorney.
My rebuttal:
1. Neither side seems to be able to definitely prove anything in relation to shorts other than providing links to sites that each side refutes. I'll leave arguing the toss amongst yourselves.
2. The shareholders I converse with have not lost anywhere near 90% including myself. You state you "expect the losses to continue". But then you've also expected sub $1.00 share price for almost a year now and still waiting.
3. That's a lot of if's and maybe's with a whole lot of here say and opinion. If the SEC wished to contact or even charge me or other shareholders with insider trading, we're still waiting as the years tick by.
has no short interest and all the wishful >>>CONspiracy thinking will not change this fact.
(0)
(0)