and as we've said Geo unfairly singled out the onl
Post# of 8059
Posted On: 11/12/2014 12:34:37 PM
Re: ClarkGriswold #7176
and as we've said Geo unfairly singled out the only very narrow issues -out of context- that could be favorable to them in bringing the case in texas in violation of the jva CA jurisdiction- which the judge only allowed because of geos broader contentions re shirley which geo never even pursued in tx case-did not even depose shirley, who was present w bob for an aug 2013 deposition.
CWRN's much much larger case against Geo for millions in actual damages and up to 100's of millions of punitive has been proceeding toward a possible default judgment after an entry of default against Geo dec 2012-
so we wait to hear the CA courts ruling on Geos 2nd pro hac vice -(authorization from the court to approve Geos proposed associate CA counsel) which CA court already rejected once.
CWRN's much much larger case against Geo for millions in actual damages and up to 100's of millions of punitive has been proceeding toward a possible default judgment after an entry of default against Geo dec 2012-
so we wait to hear the CA courts ruling on Geos 2nd pro hac vice -(authorization from the court to approve Geos proposed associate CA counsel) which CA court already rejected once.
(0)
(0)