I disagree. You told me yourself about ntek. You
Post# of 4205
Posted On: 11/06/2014 2:37:46 AM
Re: rustydog62 #1752
I disagree. You told me yourself about ntek. You thought then, as did I, that ntek was telling the truth about the np1 coming last year.
You told me yourself.
Besides,akustiqx said he started watching a year ago as did I.
How did he know to wait. Clearly he thought the company was good.
The question is why didn't he invest then like I did?
Why did he think, unlike you and I, that in spite of it being a good company, and ntek saying the np1 was imminent, that he could wait?
Besides, he didn't visit ntek till After ipmc did. He said so in his post.
So if he didn't think it was worth investing in when the np1 was imminent, according to ntek, why hang around?
Unless he knew the np1 was just being developed.
More importantly.
Why did ntek feel it necessary to lie about it.
How did some know to wait.
And please, don't give me the old,
But the ceo invested at 17 cents.
Cause he too knew it was being developed.
Cause he could have used the opportunity to more than make up the difference shorting a stock he knew was going down. cause he knew when the np1 was going to be developed.
How convenient the guy who funded through development owns a financial company that can hide who is shorting what.
May just be a confluence of coincidence.
Maybe not.
You told me yourself.
Besides,akustiqx said he started watching a year ago as did I.
How did he know to wait. Clearly he thought the company was good.
The question is why didn't he invest then like I did?
Why did he think, unlike you and I, that in spite of it being a good company, and ntek saying the np1 was imminent, that he could wait?
Besides, he didn't visit ntek till After ipmc did. He said so in his post.
So if he didn't think it was worth investing in when the np1 was imminent, according to ntek, why hang around?
Unless he knew the np1 was just being developed.
More importantly.
Why did ntek feel it necessary to lie about it.
How did some know to wait.
And please, don't give me the old,
But the ceo invested at 17 cents.
Cause he too knew it was being developed.
Cause he could have used the opportunity to more than make up the difference shorting a stock he knew was going down. cause he knew when the np1 was going to be developed.
How convenient the guy who funded through development owns a financial company that can hide who is shorting what.
May just be a confluence of coincidence.
Maybe not.
(0)
(0)