i see comprehension continues to be an issue
what i've said is there is a logical sequence that even those with
limited skill sets can *grasp* if they actually think about it ..
and while masters' minions can't ID national co. because it blows
their 4+ years' efforts of bogus bs to smithereens .. this *co* isn't
the only one to work with P2O over the past years .. those other
co.s are highly respected .. each adds to the other
and after years of getting 1 year permits out of NYSDEC .. 5 and 10
(most recent) should also *reveal* something
sorry this continues to *elude* >> but i'm the investor who indicated
a while ago .. that direct sales would make the most sense at this
stage of the co.s *transition* .. so it came as no surprise to me to
hear that one line out of RH's mouth via the CC back in August 2013
what i find beyond amusing by every *naysayer* is this:
had RH wanted to dangle the carrot (troll speak) .. P2O wouldn't
have hired the CFO >> and sure as hell the CFO wouldn't have
taken one third of his pay in a *penny* stock priced @ the end of
each Q's closing price (i'm sure he thanks the most recent effort
for getting him more PTOI shares) .. nor would mgmt have filed
the K (2013) to the tune of $285,000 .. or filed FY 2014 Q1 and Q2
nor would both the Ceo and P2O's founder .. self funded *ops*
in 2014
if *some* want to believe that P2O isn't going to sell prox .. that
is their prerogative .. i don't agree with it and i'm more than content
to await what mgmt files and updates next .. and unlike the shifting stance
of some *trolls* recently .. i don't ask anyone to *hit* the ask or sell
because only those with a broker's license can proffer financial advice
even more importantly to me than the bought and paid for sec's *words of wisdom*
is each individual recognizing their own risk reward .. educating themselves
to *risk tolerance* and *timelines* .. but mostly learning the patterns
in play (clarity) when it comes to the poorly watched and always
heavily manipulated OTC where P2O currently resides ..
are we done yet?
4kids
what i've said is there is a logical sequence that even those with
limited skill sets can *grasp* if they actually think about it ..
and while masters' minions can't ID national co. because it blows
their 4+ years' efforts of bogus bs to smithereens .. this *co* isn't
the only one to work with P2O over the past years .. those other
co.s are highly respected .. each adds to the other
and after years of getting 1 year permits out of NYSDEC .. 5 and 10
(most recent) should also *reveal* something
sorry this continues to *elude* >> but i'm the investor who indicated
a while ago .. that direct sales would make the most sense at this
stage of the co.s *transition* .. so it came as no surprise to me to
hear that one line out of RH's mouth via the CC back in August 2013
what i find beyond amusing by every *naysayer* is this:
had RH wanted to dangle the carrot (troll speak) .. P2O wouldn't
have hired the CFO >> and sure as hell the CFO wouldn't have
taken one third of his pay in a *penny* stock priced @ the end of
each Q's closing price (i'm sure he thanks the most recent effort
for getting him more PTOI shares) .. nor would mgmt have filed
the K (2013) to the tune of $285,000 .. or filed FY 2014 Q1 and Q2
nor would both the Ceo and P2O's founder .. self funded *ops*
in 2014
if *some* want to believe that P2O isn't going to sell prox .. that
is their prerogative .. i don't agree with it and i'm more than content
to await what mgmt files and updates next .. and unlike the shifting stance
of some *trolls* recently .. i don't ask anyone to *hit* the ask or sell
because only those with a broker's license can proffer financial advice
even more importantly to me than the bought and paid for sec's *words of wisdom*
is each individual recognizing their own risk reward .. educating themselves
to *risk tolerance* and *timelines* .. but mostly learning the patterns
in play (clarity) when it comes to the poorly watched and always
heavily manipulated OTC where P2O currently resides ..
are we done yet?
4kids
