"Excerpt: 'It seems obvious to us that many, pro
Post# of 43064
'It seems obvious to us that many, probably most, of the posters on these sites are actually paid shills with no personal interest in the stock. Why do we surmise this? At least as to those making negative comments, if they were bona fide holders of the stock, they would presumably sell and go away. Yet most of them continue making negative remarks for years, often with wild accusations without any proof. Who else but a paid shill would have an incentive to do this?' "
- AlanC
To me and others who post with no financial incentive, only to point out scams in the market, that "Former market maker, futures trader, securities attorney, underwriter, investment banker, securities analyst, “quant,” venture company president, venture capitalist" doesn't seem very bright. Especially since he's attributing all that power to message boards rather than pointing out that the fundamentals of a company are what make or break the stock.
And seriously, not one of you average-downers here suspect anything at all is wrong with the story line from PTOI five and a half years of non-performance later?!? Really??? You don't have one iota of doubt that Mr. Bordynuik might have lied about the capabilities of his "secret catalyst"??? If you figure it out, you'll know why you're down up to 99% on your investment. Other people figured out that they were being swindled while you kept the faith.