Not negative about the company at all-have never been
anybody who reads my posts sees I totally believe in the co's products.
I've been trying to PROTECT/warn the company/longs about some of the games/tactics shorters use,including the very common ce slap on companies who transition to substantial revenues while still non-current otc classification.
Since so many still dont get it, Otc , sec, fbi, dtc,brokers etc are all opposed to non-current classification and have been politically charged as I've explained to eliminate non-current companies.
i find it bizarre so many are having trouble understanding after explaining it in detail and totally missing the point.
I'm trying to prevent that from happening to NNLX- which I'm told has now been informed of the ce trap -
but if even the geniuses here who have read much more about it than that which had been relayed to the company,that does not encourage me to believe the company understands it.
when i 1st posted about it leaders here didnt even know what a ce was.
You should ask-why would people be opposed to warning the co????? Thats the real question.
The stock i was in that was transitioning from no info/limited info to otcqb was hit w a ce when pps rose because shorters called otc to fraudulently say there was promo-when there wasnt.
But otc broadly defines almost anything that causes significant pps increase to be a promo in a noncurrent co.
They and sec brokers etc believe any co which transitions to significant revenue while still no info is defrauding investors- thats THEIR belief/mindset.
thus to PROTECT the co/longs I've warned the co needs to upgrade to current BEFORE some event causes pps to rise significantly and thus get a ce now that they are transitioning to substantial revenues,
because otc etc are trying to force all co's to upgrade to current and thus have slapped a ce on thousands of companies over the years-last i knew there were maybe 500 ce co's.
longs lost 99% in that other ce because once a ce is imposed-almost always without warning ,brokers prohibit buying while shorting, and the co is put on sec etc radar/sanctions etc.
I sensed this would happen to NNLX unless they upgraded before the catalsyts we know are coming do raise pps enough to get a ce.
I've explained and posted from otc's own site the reasons why shorters target non-current co's.
So i'm explaining a SOLUTION to much of the shorter problem which will also protect the co from a ce and broker restrictions and sec sanctions etc.
SOLUTIONS are not negative-they are positive. If nnlx experiences a ce etc because they have not understood this, everybody will wish they had followed this advice.
Yet i've been vilified and STRONGLY hated and falsely accused by some for warning about this problem-which makes no sense.
A rational approach would be -thank you so much for warning about this -because we werent aware of this at all.
in the co i which i experienced this,longs blamed the company and mods and dd longs for NOT warning about this-and at that time many of these things were new -never before seen-so nobody could warn about this.
Longs blamed/threatened/hated the co and the mods and dd longs for NOT warning-it became a continuous blame game/cesspool of threats/hatred. I'm trying to PREVENT that from happening here. Thats a GOOD thing-a POSITIVE thing.
i dont control otc sec brokers or their beliefs. They dont allow co or 3rd parties to do ANYTHING that causes a large pps increase unless the co is current otc class.
anybody who reads my posts sees I totally believe in the co's products.
I've been trying to PROTECT/warn the company/longs about some of the games/tactics shorters use,including the very common ce slap on companies who transition to substantial revenues while still non-current otc classification.
Since so many still dont get it, Otc , sec, fbi, dtc,brokers etc are all opposed to non-current classification and have been politically charged as I've explained to eliminate non-current companies.
i find it bizarre so many are having trouble understanding after explaining it in detail and totally missing the point.
I'm trying to prevent that from happening to NNLX- which I'm told has now been informed of the ce trap -
but if even the geniuses here who have read much more about it than that which had been relayed to the company,that does not encourage me to believe the company understands it.
when i 1st posted about it leaders here didnt even know what a ce was.
You should ask-why would people be opposed to warning the co????? Thats the real question.
The stock i was in that was transitioning from no info/limited info to otcqb was hit w a ce when pps rose because shorters called otc to fraudulently say there was promo-when there wasnt.
But otc broadly defines almost anything that causes significant pps increase to be a promo in a noncurrent co.
They and sec brokers etc believe any co which transitions to significant revenue while still no info is defrauding investors- thats THEIR belief/mindset.
thus to PROTECT the co/longs I've warned the co needs to upgrade to current BEFORE some event causes pps to rise significantly and thus get a ce now that they are transitioning to substantial revenues,
because otc etc are trying to force all co's to upgrade to current and thus have slapped a ce on thousands of companies over the years-last i knew there were maybe 500 ce co's.
longs lost 99% in that other ce because once a ce is imposed-almost always without warning ,brokers prohibit buying while shorting, and the co is put on sec etc radar/sanctions etc.
I sensed this would happen to NNLX unless they upgraded before the catalsyts we know are coming do raise pps enough to get a ce.
I've explained and posted from otc's own site the reasons why shorters target non-current co's.
So i'm explaining a SOLUTION to much of the shorter problem which will also protect the co from a ce and broker restrictions and sec sanctions etc.
SOLUTIONS are not negative-they are positive. If nnlx experiences a ce etc because they have not understood this, everybody will wish they had followed this advice.
Yet i've been vilified and STRONGLY hated and falsely accused by some for warning about this problem-which makes no sense.
A rational approach would be -thank you so much for warning about this -because we werent aware of this at all.
in the co i which i experienced this,longs blamed the company and mods and dd longs for NOT warning about this-and at that time many of these things were new -never before seen-so nobody could warn about this.
Longs blamed/threatened/hated the co and the mods and dd longs for NOT warning-it became a continuous blame game/cesspool of threats/hatred. I'm trying to PREVENT that from happening here. Thats a GOOD thing-a POSITIVE thing.
i dont control otc sec brokers or their beliefs. They dont allow co or 3rd parties to do ANYTHING that causes a large pps increase unless the co is current otc class.
