Yes, we need to be "on topic" but a poster who thr

Yes, we need to be "on topic" but a poster who threatens anyone who disagrees with him/her is someone all serious analytical posters must be concerned with. For example, I don't agree with all of your posts as I am sure you don't agree with all mine. BUT if I say, Ray, I have connections and if you keep this up you will be subject to serious "sanctions" then what would be your response? I can take care of myself quite well. But many people can't or don't want to be put in that situation so what is the effect on investors generally of this stuff?

The "on topic" info is that the company is doing some great stuff. The fact that people like "idiot" and his "connected gang" [read criminal conspiracy] is able at the moment to keep a "lid" on the share price because us "longs" already have our stake and are not buying is the most critical factor in the share price. If the shares were free floating on an expanded market then the price would be considerably above current levels.

The problem is the combination of corrupt "bashing" and that the limited trading is on low levels on which it can be manipulated. 120 million shares and even today with a "high" 400K shares traded is less than one-half of one percent. Easily "played". And think how it goes with 30,000 or 70,000 shares on trade. So pathetically simple to adjust the price. That is the "on topic" issue because the company shows continuing growth in a diverse set of substantive and important areas as shown in the press release. Go after the crooks if your immediate concern is share price because they are artificially suppressing the share value.