so for those of you who've asked me what the PROs'

so for those of you who've asked me what the PROs' line in the sand means (old and new)

let me clarify .. PROs can stall provided there is no news
for most co.s this is worked around *fins filed* and news' releases

they have algos (aka artificial intelligence) that can be utilized to pick
up any nuance

it can be pacer updates .. it can be NRs .. it can be *posts* on SMBs

so going back to dolt's settlement of Jan 2013 >>

we know they *halted* the trade @ a pps of 1.49
which clearly fit my oft called >> price of interest (*volume*) 1.50 to 1.65

what has become crystal clear since the national co. was id'd via the
public domain (and why hedgie trolls' can't *post* that *known* info)
is because this *entity* can't even do a CONtrolled *orchestrated* run to 50c

there are 2 reasons for that ..

1 is because they could lose their CONtroll of that run .. if MOMO
via the vehicle of choice for OTC stock manipulation *entered*

and

2 because their line in the sand is now *SIGNIFICANTLY* lower
than Jan 2013's pps

at a guess it's 25c to 35c ..

now think about this for a few

imo P2O's realistic PPS currently is 1.25

factor in >>

class period settlement signed off of
remediation ordered for seneca
national co. noted via mgmt publicly
first asset sale 8k'd
BoD seated
AGM date filed
3rd Q fins filed
second asset sale 8k'd

and what is the *true* (not manipulated) >> value of P2O via PTOI?

i'd say it's significantly higher than 25c to 35c

and that is the dilemma this *entity* now faces

now in their favor >> lack of updates out of P2O's mgmt
and what they are counting on >> literally >> EOY tax loss selling
to aid and abet their *unique* ability to make 4 to 5 *bogus* shares
out of 1 *legit* sold

ie >> 25k sold = 100,000 to 125,000 in *volume*

but as i've noted a few x over >> when one is UPSIDE DOWN
re: PTOI's *float* >> what is another 500,000 to 1M amongst
colluding entities (NN and various decoys)

MM MONTHLY for Sept >> is due out (coincidentally) next Wed (10.1.14)

never dull .. but almost always .. *predictable*

4kids