And what's even more incredible is that you and ot
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 09/22/2014 5:57:43 PM
Re: PaperProphet #13943
And what's even more incredible is that you and others are here 24/7 bashing a company that you say you have no stake in (at least you say that, I expect you need the share price to tank to cover your short shares).
Reader, ask yourself this, why would anyone spend thousands of hours slagging this company on multiple public stock message boards. It's just not normal to spend day and night, month after month, year after year bashing a company they have no financial in. They are short, naked short or paid bashers.
I recommend you look up the meaning of the word "troll". Google may even have their pictures their now as they are so prevalent and fit the meaning to a "T".
P.S. Has anyone seen anything written by Mr. Bordynuik about his ex-girlfriend. No. I expect anyone named in frivilious suits by an ex-girlfriend, in two different countries, would be "hopping mad". In the first suit she was laughted out of court with a resounding dismissal basically calling her a liar. Now she's recruiting trolls to testify for her at the most recent lawsuit because she has no grounds for the suit.
Reader, ask yourself this, why would anyone spend thousands of hours slagging this company on multiple public stock message boards. It's just not normal to spend day and night, month after month, year after year bashing a company they have no financial in. They are short, naked short or paid bashers.
I recommend you look up the meaning of the word "troll". Google may even have their pictures their now as they are so prevalent and fit the meaning to a "T".
P.S. Has anyone seen anything written by Mr. Bordynuik about his ex-girlfriend. No. I expect anyone named in frivilious suits by an ex-girlfriend, in two different countries, would be "hopping mad". In the first suit she was laughted out of court with a resounding dismissal basically calling her a liar. Now she's recruiting trolls to testify for her at the most recent lawsuit because she has no grounds for the suit.
(0)
(0)