the resource as per Rizzo is not in question re

the resource as per Rizzo is not in question

redrock and the negative balance sheet pinksheet which announced the program via pr's on aug 19 and 25 are until now unknown entities to us and have redrock and their accredited investors at heart -not sirg or sirgs stockholders -kpsc whatever announces it as if it were a done deal whereas any deal if there is one is conditioned on raising the funds

any deal should have been announced jointly w sirg-which has a duty to report material events like blm adq permit and funding agreements


SO WHY HASNT SIRG REPORTED ANY OF THESE THINGS
WHY WOULD YOU EXPECT LONGTIME SIRG SHAREHOLDERS TO TAKE YOUR OR REDROCK WORDS AT FACE VALUE-

you are obviously the leader of a johnny come lately pumping group
and havetn paid your dues here so dont impugn me because of the way redrock et al have handled this just because your group hasnt made the hit and run killing they expected from your groups ihub promo campaign

IT IS SUSPICIOUS SIRG HASNT REPORTED THESE THINGS AND RED ROCKET ET AL OUGHT TO KNOW THAT

i dont like the way redrock handled it -at the july11 press conference known to us only months later they say to paraphrase:
1) we've got the power
2) these junior miners are desperate for funding
3) thus we can dictate our harsh terms to them

its great for redrock and their accredited investors who disproportionately get a large part of the profit plus de facto operational control (which could destroy sirg ) at the expense of sirg and sirg shareholders-

almost calculated to the point where if redrock took anymore it would not be worthwhile to sirg -is that why sirg has been silent????? the harsh terms have to be a hard pill for sirg management to swallow also assuming its not a scam