*entity* is on FUMES >> it's not going to take muc

*entity* is on FUMES >> it's not going to take much (8k/update) to trigger threshold

be very interesting to see what and when mgmt files next

reminder >> if the judge signs off on the class period settlement on 9.25.14
i'd expect mgmt to file an 8k within 4 business days ..

EOQ = 9.30.14 >> the following Tuesday ..

4th Q starts on 10.1.14 >> which obviously is Wednesday

there are 3 things i can see 8k'd .. (and/or updated by mgmt)
within the next 2 weeks

first is 5 and 10 year permits via NYSDEC
second is national company id'd and expanded upon
third is detailed info re: class period settlement

from that point on >> imo it's gonna be beyond revealing to observe
what is filed next

first asset sale
BoD seated
AGM date filed
3rd Q filed
second asset sale

i see at a minimum Ceo changed out .. probably post AGM
i expect >> one *focus* is on branding re: P2O .. which may come
from a contracted IR/marketing co.
i see the distinct possibility of a one time special cash div b4 uplisting
and i see uplisting out of the OTC cesspool in 2015

it's my sincere belief that this *entity* >> in aggregate >> after 4+ years of efforts
is upside down when it comes to PTOI's *float*

to give you an idea of how bad of a hole they've dug >> the float is 67,829,555

to cover even half of the float >> we are talking 34M shares ..

it's very easy to call for 2 to 3 x the record setting volume month currently ..
(April 2011) >> 8M+ .. (16 to 24M)

it's equally easy to call for a partial cover of 20.00 to 40.00 (entity may not
have the luxury of laddering) if mgmt gives the least amount of notice
re: uplisting >> as possible >> but it's no secret ..

i won't be surprised if trades go off >> double that *range* within a week of *volume* of significance

they've lost >> even tho' (zero doubts) they know the name of the national co.
they can't ID it >> because it blows their years' of bogus bs to smithereens

they are reduced to *cycling* shares in a tightly controlled pps range >>
comparable to March 2011 .. and i'm seriously beginning to believe
that sub 50c
is their waterloo >> vs the 1.50 - 1.65 in place *imo* for years

except for that round >> this *entity* >> CONtrolled the outcome ..

i wonder with hindsight if they would covered that first 1M abusive short (2009)
vs what they face now ..

just a reminder folks >> legit bid support provides speed bumps ..

interesting to note today's *tape* >> they actually had to mark reg sho >> ask hits

it's been awhile ..


4kids