What he said is public info: 1. Site One was in
Post# of 56324
Posted On: 09/04/2014 11:45:30 PM
Re: Patriatfan #35803
What he said is public info:
1. Site One was inspected (official PR)
2. Site Two was not inspected (no PR. Frankly, it may have been, but hes not disclosing if it was. As an example, until the inspection PR, Bill kept repeating that 7.31 was a dry run.)
3. No discrepancies (public info passed through Alan Brochstein)
4. Hes said to keep eyes peeled for a PR for a solid month now (source: me talking to him. If you dont believe me, feel free to call.)
This news flash is all old news. What I don't get is why people are excited over stuff thats been out for weeks. Not referring to you here. I'm referring to everyone excited about old news as if it was the license PR itself, which is coming and we knew was coming.
Theres plenty to be excited about, but I'm missing the point in this one.
1. Site One was inspected (official PR)
2. Site Two was not inspected (no PR. Frankly, it may have been, but hes not disclosing if it was. As an example, until the inspection PR, Bill kept repeating that 7.31 was a dry run.)
3. No discrepancies (public info passed through Alan Brochstein)
4. Hes said to keep eyes peeled for a PR for a solid month now (source: me talking to him. If you dont believe me, feel free to call.)
This news flash is all old news. What I don't get is why people are excited over stuff thats been out for weeks. Not referring to you here. I'm referring to everyone excited about old news as if it was the license PR itself, which is coming and we knew was coming.
Theres plenty to be excited about, but I'm missing the point in this one.
(0)
(0)