FITX Alerts 08/30/2014 22:25:19 $FITX
Mayor Bain stated 3 to 4 months a month ago. I was basing the timeline on his statements.
So it comes down to this. You really do not think there is zoning issue. Well there is. It is not zoned for what Bill claims they want to do. According to the hc website they can get a license even with the zoning issues. But is not the license based on sf of production? If that is the case would that mean hc can only issue a license for the zoned sf amount?
FITX Stock Message Board http://investorshangout.com/Creative-Edge-Nut...ITX-63675/
Not necessarily 2-3 months out. Once OPEN HOUSE takes place, it SHOULD be back on the agenda shortly thereafter. IMO, FITX has dropped the ball here.
Bill - Coordinate with Lakeshore to schedule the open house. Let me know you got this. Thanks.
Oh I do understand. You think if they may marijauna production illegal in lakeshore you can still operate.
Last Call May Arrive Earlier At 4 A.m. Bars
Cook County Considers Cutting Off Late-night Licenses
January 16, 2001|By David Ibata, Tribune Staff Writer.
100
Well after midnight, the crowds are just arriving at Dakota's Bar & Grill, a dance club on Algonquin Road just outside Schaumburg's village limits.
Dakota's is a 4 a.m. bar, one of 35 in unincorporated Cook County. It can stay open later than any other restaurant or tavern in the surrounding villages. And as those establishments close each night, cars begin to stream into Dakota's parking lot.
You are right about chicago. Cook County never did change the laws. If they did they grandfather you in as they did in other counties.
lol wrong again In chicago you can get a liquor license till 4 am STILL. It's called a tavern license. And it depends on the neighborhood and the alderman. Second the tavern license when sold STAYS a tavern license.
It's obvious you don't understand the difference between Zoning regulations ordinances AND a ban
I live in colorado and I know why. The town had no problem until crime went up. So they voted to shut them down after it was legal for years. There is no grandfathering when it pertains to legal and illegal. There is when it comes to changing building code and sometimes even hours. Take chicago for instance. Bars could buy a license that let them stay open until four. That license is no longer available. It is grandfathered for the owners of the licenses but once they sell the license is over and the new owner has to close at 2 or 2:30.
Prohibition in the USA shut down all kinds of businesses.
So your saying that once they start growing marijauna they will be grandfathered in regardless of any law changes is false.
No they actually can't they would have a lawsuit on their hands. No the town also has to abide by the laws!
Nope not wrong your confusing bans and zoning ordinances
The businesses opened up and the town decided they didn't want any marijuana businesses in town so they banned them. The other option was to enact zoning ordinances and regulations marijuana businesses would have to abide by. If the town decided to enact regulations then those existing businesses that were operating would be GRANDFATHERED in and all new businesses that would try to open up would have to abide by the regulations
Why do you think that the dispensaries were allowed to operated for 2 years until the town made a decision? Because they couldn't be shut down without legislation.
Again its been proven many times in the US google Pre ICO LA dispensaries. Many cities around the country have dispensaries and marijuana businesses grandfathered in, its very common cause the businesses open before the town knows whats happening
Nobody is grand fathered in and the Town of Lakeshore is still 2 to 3 months away with the rules and regulations.
Lakesore can ban and shut down a business at any time. Especially one that they have not addresses how to handle as it became legal in Canada only 8 months. Maybe Bill should have ironed all of this out before he built the structure on his cousins property.
Wrong Again. Longmont dispensaries were in business for years.
OULDER — A Boulder County District Court judge refused to stop Longmont from enforcing its ban of medical marijuana businesses today, denying the city's dispensaries a preliminary injunction in their lawsuit.
"Turn off the ‘Open' sign," Longmont Apothecary manager Jason Hicks said softly into a cell phone after Judge Ingrid Bakke's ruling. Bakke found that the dispensaries did not have a constitutional right to operate under Amendment 20 of the Colorado Constitution, nor a protected propety interest that could be guarded by an injunction.
Eric Dugwyler of Longmont exclaims "Nooooo!" as he discovers that the Longmont Apothecary dispensary is closed on Friday afternoon. A Boulder
Eric Dugwyler of Longmont exclaims "Nooooo!" as he discovers that the Longmont Apothecary dispensary is closed on Friday afternoon. A Boulder Count District Court judge refused to stop Longmont from enforcing its ban of medical marijuana businesses today, denying the city's dispensaries a preliminary injunction in their lawsuit. (Richard M. Hackett/Times-Call)
The judge acknowledged that the decision would hurt the dispensaries, one of which testified that it had spent two years developing some of the marijuana strains it would now have to let go.
"I very much sympathize with you," Bakke said, "but you are very much victims of developing law that even to this day is in a very gray area."
Longmont City Atttorney Eugene Mei said afterward that he was pleased with the judge's ruling, which will allow the city's ban to go forward. The City Council banned marijuana-related businesses in May, originally to take effect July 1. The actual date was delayed for over a month and a half, first by a failed attempt to put the ban on the November ballot as a referendum, and then by the lawsuit and a temporary restraining order.
Here is a more recent one. This one is sure to make you laugh.
Medical Marijuana On Back Burner
By Ricardo Veneza on July 20, 2014
A Lakeshore resident shares his concerns with council over a proposed bylaw to regulate hemp and medical marijuana production at its regular meeting on July 15, 2014. (Photo by Ricardo Veneza)
Mayor Bain stated 3 to 4 months a month ago. I was basing the timeline on his statements.
So it comes down to this. You really do not think there is zoning issue. Well there is. It is not zoned for what Bill claims they want to do. According to the hc website they can get a license even with the zoning issues. But is not the license based on sf of production? If that is the case would that mean hc can only issue a license for the zoned sf amount?
FITX Stock Message Board http://investorshangout.com/Creative-Edge-Nut...ITX-63675/
Not necessarily 2-3 months out. Once OPEN HOUSE takes place, it SHOULD be back on the agenda shortly thereafter. IMO, FITX has dropped the ball here.
Bill - Coordinate with Lakeshore to schedule the open house. Let me know you got this. Thanks.
Oh I do understand. You think if they may marijauna production illegal in lakeshore you can still operate.
Last Call May Arrive Earlier At 4 A.m. Bars
Cook County Considers Cutting Off Late-night Licenses
January 16, 2001|By David Ibata, Tribune Staff Writer.
100
Well after midnight, the crowds are just arriving at Dakota's Bar & Grill, a dance club on Algonquin Road just outside Schaumburg's village limits.
Dakota's is a 4 a.m. bar, one of 35 in unincorporated Cook County. It can stay open later than any other restaurant or tavern in the surrounding villages. And as those establishments close each night, cars begin to stream into Dakota's parking lot.
You are right about chicago. Cook County never did change the laws. If they did they grandfather you in as they did in other counties.
lol wrong again In chicago you can get a liquor license till 4 am STILL. It's called a tavern license. And it depends on the neighborhood and the alderman. Second the tavern license when sold STAYS a tavern license.
It's obvious you don't understand the difference between Zoning regulations ordinances AND a ban
I live in colorado and I know why. The town had no problem until crime went up. So they voted to shut them down after it was legal for years. There is no grandfathering when it pertains to legal and illegal. There is when it comes to changing building code and sometimes even hours. Take chicago for instance. Bars could buy a license that let them stay open until four. That license is no longer available. It is grandfathered for the owners of the licenses but once they sell the license is over and the new owner has to close at 2 or 2:30.
Prohibition in the USA shut down all kinds of businesses.
So your saying that once they start growing marijauna they will be grandfathered in regardless of any law changes is false.
No they actually can't they would have a lawsuit on their hands. No the town also has to abide by the laws!
Nope not wrong your confusing bans and zoning ordinances
The businesses opened up and the town decided they didn't want any marijuana businesses in town so they banned them. The other option was to enact zoning ordinances and regulations marijuana businesses would have to abide by. If the town decided to enact regulations then those existing businesses that were operating would be GRANDFATHERED in and all new businesses that would try to open up would have to abide by the regulations
Why do you think that the dispensaries were allowed to operated for 2 years until the town made a decision? Because they couldn't be shut down without legislation.
Again its been proven many times in the US google Pre ICO LA dispensaries. Many cities around the country have dispensaries and marijuana businesses grandfathered in, its very common cause the businesses open before the town knows whats happening
Nobody is grand fathered in and the Town of Lakeshore is still 2 to 3 months away with the rules and regulations.
Lakesore can ban and shut down a business at any time. Especially one that they have not addresses how to handle as it became legal in Canada only 8 months. Maybe Bill should have ironed all of this out before he built the structure on his cousins property.
Wrong Again. Longmont dispensaries were in business for years.
OULDER — A Boulder County District Court judge refused to stop Longmont from enforcing its ban of medical marijuana businesses today, denying the city's dispensaries a preliminary injunction in their lawsuit.
"Turn off the ‘Open' sign," Longmont Apothecary manager Jason Hicks said softly into a cell phone after Judge Ingrid Bakke's ruling. Bakke found that the dispensaries did not have a constitutional right to operate under Amendment 20 of the Colorado Constitution, nor a protected propety interest that could be guarded by an injunction.
Eric Dugwyler of Longmont exclaims "Nooooo!" as he discovers that the Longmont Apothecary dispensary is closed on Friday afternoon. A Boulder
Eric Dugwyler of Longmont exclaims "Nooooo!" as he discovers that the Longmont Apothecary dispensary is closed on Friday afternoon. A Boulder Count District Court judge refused to stop Longmont from enforcing its ban of medical marijuana businesses today, denying the city's dispensaries a preliminary injunction in their lawsuit. (Richard M. Hackett/Times-Call)
The judge acknowledged that the decision would hurt the dispensaries, one of which testified that it had spent two years developing some of the marijuana strains it would now have to let go.
"I very much sympathize with you," Bakke said, "but you are very much victims of developing law that even to this day is in a very gray area."
Longmont City Atttorney Eugene Mei said afterward that he was pleased with the judge's ruling, which will allow the city's ban to go forward. The City Council banned marijuana-related businesses in May, originally to take effect July 1. The actual date was delayed for over a month and a half, first by a failed attempt to put the ban on the November ballot as a referendum, and then by the lawsuit and a temporary restraining order.
Here is a more recent one. This one is sure to make you laugh.
Medical Marijuana On Back Burner
By Ricardo Veneza on July 20, 2014
A Lakeshore resident shares his concerns with council over a proposed bylaw to regulate hemp and medical marijuana production at its regular meeting on July 15, 2014. (Photo by Ricardo Veneza)
