As I understand it, the sale of processors was als

As I understand it, the sale of processors was also going to include several recurring revenue streams, one of which was sales of the catalyst to said processor end users.....my guess is that they would stipulate that the end user would not try to duplicate the catalyst, or re-sell it to someone who would?

P.S.: There seems to be a lot of discussion about bankruptcy lately; I think such talk is premature. There is a difference between being on a tight budget, and being bankrupt. I believe for now the former applies. And my guess is that if processor sales are being cultivated, any suggestion to management by shareholders to drop what they're doing and focus solely on licensing catalyst sales would be met with a healthy dose of "get the f..k out of here and shut the hell up - you don't have a clue of what you are talking about."

It is highly unlikely that someone would develop state of the art processing equipment only to focus solely on the sales of the additives to that processor..... Certainly not PTOI.