FNMA Company info 08/28/2014 11:23:46 $FNMA
Big Money loading don'ts finish yet!!He/They don't want to take the PPS out off loading zone ,YET!!!IMO, Yesterday 3mill or less take up PPS from 3.85 to 4.07 a considerable jump in few shares ,they want load slow for the moment.GO FnF
PARTY OVER (FNMA) MOVE ALONG FOLKS
Nothing to see here. Up list news proved to be rumor confirmed by
Fannie itself. Fannie closing its doors in 2 - 3 years is keeping the
stock flat and will lead to the continued downward spiral. USG
will not allow a uplist. Plain and simple. Major stock experts agree.
PPS target by end of September is 3.06.
FNMA Stock Message Board http://investorshangout.com/Fannie-Mae-FNMA-61730/
Focusing on costs, Fannie Mae to put HQ on the block
10:55 AM ET · FNMA
“We are focused on making responsible real estate decisions to ensure the wise use of resources," says a Fannie Mae (OTCQB:FNMA -0.3%) spokesperson of the company's plans to sell it's sprawling headquarters as part of a consolidation of its 5 D.C. offices into a single leased office building.
Previously: Fannie Mae eyeing return to the Big Board?
Letgo-I do not think a 90 year old women gets used by anyone. I imagine she wants to what she thinks is the right thing to do.
She is not selling her soul for anyone.
Obvious
Quote:
With the addition of a corporate attorney to its team, Fannie Mae is now looking to rid itself from government control. The company’s stock price has gained over 220% in the last year and its market cap is now above the minimum level required to be listed on the NYSE.
http://www.bidnessetc.com/24762-fannie-mae-up...-the-nyse/
As far as an "agreement" being made...it was pointed out that I was incorrect when the warrants were actually issued...it was AFTER the boards agreed to conservatorship. So...based on that, the BOD of both companies had no say in the matter...the director of FHFA was in total control and had/has absolute power of decision.
Per the Pershing court filing - page 13 item 41 & 42
https://timhoward717.files.wordpress.com/2014...aint-2.pdf
Now the question is...did FHFA lie to the BOD...or did the BOD agree prior to C-ship...we don't know. I don't think there is a public record of those conversations...could be there is...maybe we will get some good stuff about this coming out in court. I would venture we will never know that answer, but I would certainly like to know if the BOD tossed us under the bus as well to appease the political machine.
Nice Rey! $$FNMA$$
That's because of the so-called "news" yesterday, right? Again, this is a new-driven stock.
Fannie relisting news!
http://www.bidnessetc.com/24762-fannie-mae-up...-the-nyse/
Do you have proof that an agreement was ever made? If so, the court will be demanding it be produced in order to act on it. Otherwise, it will be assumed one doesn't exist. If there were an agreement, it would be in the public records. None exists.
Opinions change with the wind. We need focus. We need leadership. The Constitution in it's pure, unadulterated form, is that focus and is our compass. The Supreme Court has lost it's footing. The Constitution is their responsibility. They no longer look at the Constitution through eyes of intent. No, they contort it to fit their own selfish, political agendas. And so we are left with an unfocused, hodgepodge mess of distorted opinions. WE THE PEOPLE are charged with the responsibility to right the ship or suffer the consequences and the consequences will be most unpleasant, I assure you.
Quote:
ok...let me ask you this...can you show PROOF that an agreement wasn't made. As for "the law is the law"...why do we have a supreme court with differing opinions? if the law is the law...then it should be back and white..all justices SHOULD come to the same conclusion....it is subject to the person's opinion, and the judge will make a decision based on their interpretation of the law...it may not or it may be something we agree with...but it will be as they decide, unless there are appeals form either side.
Quote:
more funds are accumulating at these levels and they ain't selling
I told to everyone that for about a year already,the last four months it's a accumulation period impressive maybe with a new Big Money with a Big Name,will know soon,the lack of information in OTC'market is a problem to retail investor,but when the loading happening finish ,we going to see the announcement who is loading shares for the last 4 months +,IMO
Are Our Mortgage Markets Broken?
by Saul GriffithAugust 28, 2014, 9:48 am
Big Money loading don'ts finish yet!!He/They don't want to take the PPS out off loading zone ,YET!!!IMO, Yesterday 3mill or less take up PPS from 3.85 to 4.07 a considerable jump in few shares ,they want load slow for the moment.GO FnF
PARTY OVER (FNMA) MOVE ALONG FOLKS
Nothing to see here. Up list news proved to be rumor confirmed by
Fannie itself. Fannie closing its doors in 2 - 3 years is keeping the
stock flat and will lead to the continued downward spiral. USG
will not allow a uplist. Plain and simple. Major stock experts agree.
PPS target by end of September is 3.06.
FNMA Stock Message Board http://investorshangout.com/Fannie-Mae-FNMA-61730/
Focusing on costs, Fannie Mae to put HQ on the block
10:55 AM ET · FNMA
“We are focused on making responsible real estate decisions to ensure the wise use of resources," says a Fannie Mae (OTCQB:FNMA -0.3%) spokesperson of the company's plans to sell it's sprawling headquarters as part of a consolidation of its 5 D.C. offices into a single leased office building.
Previously: Fannie Mae eyeing return to the Big Board?
Letgo-I do not think a 90 year old women gets used by anyone. I imagine she wants to what she thinks is the right thing to do.
She is not selling her soul for anyone.
Obvious
Quote:
With the addition of a corporate attorney to its team, Fannie Mae is now looking to rid itself from government control. The company’s stock price has gained over 220% in the last year and its market cap is now above the minimum level required to be listed on the NYSE.
http://www.bidnessetc.com/24762-fannie-mae-up...-the-nyse/
As far as an "agreement" being made...it was pointed out that I was incorrect when the warrants were actually issued...it was AFTER the boards agreed to conservatorship. So...based on that, the BOD of both companies had no say in the matter...the director of FHFA was in total control and had/has absolute power of decision.
Per the Pershing court filing - page 13 item 41 & 42
https://timhoward717.files.wordpress.com/2014...aint-2.pdf
Now the question is...did FHFA lie to the BOD...or did the BOD agree prior to C-ship...we don't know. I don't think there is a public record of those conversations...could be there is...maybe we will get some good stuff about this coming out in court. I would venture we will never know that answer, but I would certainly like to know if the BOD tossed us under the bus as well to appease the political machine.
Nice Rey! $$FNMA$$
That's because of the so-called "news" yesterday, right? Again, this is a new-driven stock.
Fannie relisting news!
http://www.bidnessetc.com/24762-fannie-mae-up...-the-nyse/
Do you have proof that an agreement was ever made? If so, the court will be demanding it be produced in order to act on it. Otherwise, it will be assumed one doesn't exist. If there were an agreement, it would be in the public records. None exists.
Opinions change with the wind. We need focus. We need leadership. The Constitution in it's pure, unadulterated form, is that focus and is our compass. The Supreme Court has lost it's footing. The Constitution is their responsibility. They no longer look at the Constitution through eyes of intent. No, they contort it to fit their own selfish, political agendas. And so we are left with an unfocused, hodgepodge mess of distorted opinions. WE THE PEOPLE are charged with the responsibility to right the ship or suffer the consequences and the consequences will be most unpleasant, I assure you.
Quote:
ok...let me ask you this...can you show PROOF that an agreement wasn't made. As for "the law is the law"...why do we have a supreme court with differing opinions? if the law is the law...then it should be back and white..all justices SHOULD come to the same conclusion....it is subject to the person's opinion, and the judge will make a decision based on their interpretation of the law...it may not or it may be something we agree with...but it will be as they decide, unless there are appeals form either side.
Quote:
more funds are accumulating at these levels and they ain't selling
I told to everyone that for about a year already,the last four months it's a accumulation period impressive maybe with a new Big Money with a Big Name,will know soon,the lack of information in OTC'market is a problem to retail investor,but when the loading happening finish ,we going to see the announcement who is loading shares for the last 4 months +,IMO
Are Our Mortgage Markets Broken?
by Saul GriffithAugust 28, 2014, 9:48 am
